Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Nonsmooth rank-one symmetric matrix factorization landscape

Cédric Josz, Lexiao Lai

TL;DR

The paper analyzes the landscape of the nonsmooth rank-one symmetric matrix factorization objective $f(x) = 1/2 \sum_{i,j=1}^n |x_i x_j - u_i u_j|$ for $u \in R^n$. It employs Rockafellar–Wets variational analysis to derive the subdifferential and conduct a detailed first- and second-order optimality analysis, including a case split on coordinates where $u_i$ vanishes or not. The main result is that there are no spurious second-order stationary points: any such point with a nonnegative second-order directional derivative must satisfy $f(x) = 0$, hence $x = \pm u$ are the only second-order stationary points. This clarifies the optimization landscape for this nonsmooth factorization problem and connects to the broader ell1-rank-one factorization literature, informing potential algorithmic approaches.

Abstract

We consider nonsmooth rank-one symmetric matrix factorization. It has no spurious second-order stationary points.

Nonsmooth rank-one symmetric matrix factorization landscape

TL;DR

The paper analyzes the landscape of the nonsmooth rank-one symmetric matrix factorization objective for . It employs Rockafellar–Wets variational analysis to derive the subdifferential and conduct a detailed first- and second-order optimality analysis, including a case split on coordinates where vanishes or not. The main result is that there are no spurious second-order stationary points: any such point with a nonnegative second-order directional derivative must satisfy , hence are the only second-order stationary points. This clarifies the optimization landscape for this nonsmooth factorization problem and connects to the broader ell1-rank-one factorization literature, informing potential algorithmic approaches.

Abstract

We consider nonsmooth rank-one symmetric matrix factorization. It has no spurious second-order stationary points.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 2 sections, 4 theorems, 11 equations, 2 figures.

Key Result

Theorem 1

For all $u \in \mathbb{R}^n$, the function has no spurious second-order stationary points.

Figures (2)

  • Figure 1: Subdifferential of $\alpha$
  • Figure 2: Visualization of the cases where $[0,\epsilon] \subset \partial \alpha(x_{i_0}/u_{i_0})$.

Theorems & Definitions (7)

  • Theorem 1
  • Lemma 1
  • proof
  • Lemma 2
  • proof
  • Lemma 3
  • proof