Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Quantizations of transposed Poisson algebras by Novikov deformations

Siyuan Chen, Chengming Bai

TL;DR

This work develops a deformation-quantization framework for transposed Poisson algebras by introducing Novikov deformations of commutative associative algebras and analyzing their classical limits. It shows that these classical limits lie in a quantizable subclass of transposed Poisson algebras and defines quantizations of transposed Poisson algebras via Novikov deformations, with a focus on Novikov-Poisson type algebras. A key result is that all transposed Poisson algebras of Novikov-Poisson type, including unital ones, admit quantizations, and the authors provide a natural construction ensuring this. The paper culminates with a complete classification of quantizations for 2-dimensional complex transposed Poisson algebras with non-abelian Lie brackets, giving explicit deformation families and equivalence criteria that illuminate the structure of quantizations in low dimensions and guide future higher-dimensional studies.

Abstract

The notions of the Novikov deformation of a commutative associative algebra and the corresponding classical limit are introduced. We show such a classical limit belongs to a subclass of transposed Poisson algebras, and hence the Novikov deformation is defined to be the quantization of the corresponding transposed Poisson algebra. As a direct consequence, we revisit the relationship between transposed Poisson algebras and Novikov-Poisson algebras due to the fact that there is a natural Novikov deformation of the commutative associative algebra in a Novikov-Poisson algebra. Hence all transposed Poisson algebras of Novikov-Poisson type, including unital transposed Poisson algebras, can be quantized. Finally, we classify the quantizations of $2$-dimensional complex transposed Poisson algebras in which the Lie brackets are non-abelian up to equivalence.

Quantizations of transposed Poisson algebras by Novikov deformations

TL;DR

This work develops a deformation-quantization framework for transposed Poisson algebras by introducing Novikov deformations of commutative associative algebras and analyzing their classical limits. It shows that these classical limits lie in a quantizable subclass of transposed Poisson algebras and defines quantizations of transposed Poisson algebras via Novikov deformations, with a focus on Novikov-Poisson type algebras. A key result is that all transposed Poisson algebras of Novikov-Poisson type, including unital ones, admit quantizations, and the authors provide a natural construction ensuring this. The paper culminates with a complete classification of quantizations for 2-dimensional complex transposed Poisson algebras with non-abelian Lie brackets, giving explicit deformation families and equivalence criteria that illuminate the structure of quantizations in low dimensions and guide future higher-dimensional studies.

Abstract

The notions of the Novikov deformation of a commutative associative algebra and the corresponding classical limit are introduced. We show such a classical limit belongs to a subclass of transposed Poisson algebras, and hence the Novikov deformation is defined to be the quantization of the corresponding transposed Poisson algebra. As a direct consequence, we revisit the relationship between transposed Poisson algebras and Novikov-Poisson algebras due to the fact that there is a natural Novikov deformation of the commutative associative algebra in a Novikov-Poisson algebra. Hence all transposed Poisson algebras of Novikov-Poisson type, including unital transposed Poisson algebras, can be quantized. Finally, we classify the quantizations of -dimensional complex transposed Poisson algebras in which the Lie brackets are non-abelian up to equivalence.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 4 sections, 14 theorems, 78 equations.

Key Result

Lemma 2.3

A Novikov algebra is commutative if and only if it is a commutative associative algebra.

Theorems & Definitions (43)

  • proof
  • Remark 2.2
  • Lemma 2.3
  • Remark 2.5
  • Example 2.6
  • Definition 2.7
  • Definition 2.8
  • Definition 2.9
  • Theorem 2.10
  • proof
  • ...and 33 more