Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Blowup for the defocusing septic complex-valued nonlinear wave equation in $\mathbb{R}^{4+1}$

Tristan Buckmaster, Jiajie Chen

Abstract

In this paper, we prove blowup for the defocusing septic complex-valued nonlinear wave equation in $\mathbb{R}^{4+1}$. This work builds on the earlier results of Shao, Wei, and Zhang [SWZ2024a,SWZ2024b], reducing the order of the nonlinearity from $29$ to $7$ in $\mathbb{R}^{4+1}$. As in [SWZ2024a,SWZ2024b], the proof hinges on a connection between solutions to the nonlinear wave equation and the relativistic Euler equations via a front compression blowup mechanism. More specifically, the problem is reduced to constructing smooth, radially symmetric, self-similar imploding profiles for the relativistic Euler equations. As with implosion for the compressible Euler equations, the relativistic analogue admits a countable family of smooth imploding profiles. The result in [SWZ2024a] represents the construction of the first profile in this family. In this paper, we construct a sequence of solutions corresponding to the higher-order profiles in the family. This allows us to saturate the inequalities necessary to show blowup for the defocusing complex-valued nonlinear wave equation with an integer order of nonlinearity and radial symmetry via this mechanism.

Blowup for the defocusing septic complex-valued nonlinear wave equation in $\mathbb{R}^{4+1}$

Abstract

In this paper, we prove blowup for the defocusing septic complex-valued nonlinear wave equation in . This work builds on the earlier results of Shao, Wei, and Zhang [SWZ2024a,SWZ2024b], reducing the order of the nonlinearity from to in . As in [SWZ2024a,SWZ2024b], the proof hinges on a connection between solutions to the nonlinear wave equation and the relativistic Euler equations via a front compression blowup mechanism. More specifically, the problem is reduced to constructing smooth, radially symmetric, self-similar imploding profiles for the relativistic Euler equations. As with implosion for the compressible Euler equations, the relativistic analogue admits a countable family of smooth imploding profiles. The result in [SWZ2024a] represents the construction of the first profile in this family. In this paper, we construct a sequence of solutions corresponding to the higher-order profiles in the family. This allows us to saturate the inequalities necessary to show blowup for the defocusing complex-valued nonlinear wave equation with an integer order of nonlinearity and radial symmetry via this mechanism.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 79 sections, 32 theorems, 450 equations, 2 figures.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

Let $d = 4, p = 7, \ell = \frac{4}{p-1}+1$, and $n$ be an odd number and large enough. There exists $\gamma_n$ accumulating at $\ell^{-1/2}$ with $\gamma_n >\ell^{-1/2} , b_n = \frac{ d-1 }{ \ell (\gamma_n + 1)} - 1>0$ such that the ODE eq:ODE admits a smooth solution $V^ { (\gamma_n) } \in C^{\in for any $Z > 0$, and $V(Z) = Z V(Z^2)$ for some function $V \in C^{\infty}[0, \infty)$. Moreover,

Figures (2)

  • Figure 1: Illustrations of phase portrait of the $(Z, V)$-ODE \ref{['eq:ODE']}. The solution curve is in black and $Z_{\pm}(V), Z_{V}(V)$ defined in \ref{['eq:root_mono_ZV0']} are roots of $\Delta_Z, \Delta_V$.
  • Figure 2: Illustrations of phase portrait of the $(Y, U)$-ODE \ref{['eq:ODE']}. The black curve represents the $C^{\infty}$ solution curve, $(Y_F, U_F)$ (orange) defined in \ref{['eq:QO_glue']} is the solution curve near $Q_O= (1/d, \infty)$, $B_l^f$ (purple) and $B_u^f$ (green) are barrier functions defined in \ref{['eq:bar_far_l']}, \ref{['eq:bar_far_u']}, $U_{\Delta_Y}$ (red) and $U_{\Delta_U}$ (blue) defined in \ref{['eq:root_UY']} are roots of $\Delta_Y, \Delta_U$. The domain $\Omega_B^f$ is defined in \ref{['eq:bar_region']} and $\Omega_{ {tri},i}$ in \ref{['eq:dom_tri']}.

Theorems & Definitions (55)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Theorem 1.2: Theorem 1.1 shao2024blow
  • Corollary 1.3
  • Remark 1.4
  • Lemma 2.1: Lemma 2.1 shao2024self
  • Lemma 2.2
  • Remark 2.3
  • Lemma 2.4
  • proof
  • Lemma 3.1
  • ...and 45 more