Table of Contents
Fetching ...

You Only Look Twice! for Failure Causes Identification of Drill Bits

Asma Yamani, Nehal Al-Otaiby, Haifa Al-Shemmeri, Imane Boudellioua

Abstract

Efficient identification of the root causes of drill bit failure is crucial due to potential impacts such as operational losses, safety threats, and delays. Early recognition of these failures enables proactive maintenance, reducing risks and financial losses associated with unforeseen breakdowns and prolonged downtime. Thus, our study investigates various causes of drill bit failure using images of different blades. The process involves annotating cutters with their respective locations and damage types, followed by the development of two YOLO Location and Damage Cutter Detection models, as well as multi-class multi-label Decision Tree and Random Forests models to identify the causes of failure by assessing the cutters' location and damage type. Additionally, RRFCI is proposed for the classification of failure causes. Notably, the cutter location detection model achieved a high score of 0.97 mPA, and the cutter damage detection model yielded a 0.49 mPA. The rule-based approach over-performed both DT and RF in failure cause identification, achieving a macro-average F1-score of 0.94 across all damage causes. The integration of the complete automated pipeline successfully identified 100\% of the 24 failure causes when tested on independent sets of ten drill bits, showcasing its potential to efficiently assist experts in identifying the root causes of drill bit damages.

You Only Look Twice! for Failure Causes Identification of Drill Bits

Abstract

Efficient identification of the root causes of drill bit failure is crucial due to potential impacts such as operational losses, safety threats, and delays. Early recognition of these failures enables proactive maintenance, reducing risks and financial losses associated with unforeseen breakdowns and prolonged downtime. Thus, our study investigates various causes of drill bit failure using images of different blades. The process involves annotating cutters with their respective locations and damage types, followed by the development of two YOLO Location and Damage Cutter Detection models, as well as multi-class multi-label Decision Tree and Random Forests models to identify the causes of failure by assessing the cutters' location and damage type. Additionally, RRFCI is proposed for the classification of failure causes. Notably, the cutter location detection model achieved a high score of 0.97 mPA, and the cutter damage detection model yielded a 0.49 mPA. The rule-based approach over-performed both DT and RF in failure cause identification, achieving a macro-average F1-score of 0.94 across all damage causes. The integration of the complete automated pipeline successfully identified 100\% of the 24 failure causes when tested on independent sets of ten drill bits, showcasing its potential to efficiently assist experts in identifying the root causes of drill bit damages.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 23 sections, 2 equations, 12 figures, 8 tables, 3 algorithms.

Figures (12)

  • Figure 1: PDC bit structure.
  • Figure 2: Smooth Wear in the Shoulder (left), in the Cone (middle), in the Gauge (right).
  • Figure 3: Normal Fracture in the Shoulder (left), in the Nose (right).
  • Figure 4: Tangential Fracture in the Shoulder (left), in the Nose (middle), and in the Cone (right).
  • Figure 5: Thermal Damage.
  • ...and 7 more figures