Table of Contents
Fetching ...

A variant of the Linnik-Sprindzuk theorem for simple zeros of Dirichlet L-functions

William D. Banks

TL;DR

The paper develops a Linnik–Sprindžuk–type framework for simple zeros of Dirichlet $L$-functions by introducing RH_sim^\dagger and showing it is controlled by the generalized Lindelöf hypothesis LH^*. Under LH^*, RH_sim^\dagger for one primitive character implies RH_sim for all Dirichlet $L$-functions, hence all simple zeros lie on the critical line and Siegel zeros are ruled out. Central to the approach is the auxiliary Dirichlet series $D(s,\chi)=\frac{L'(s,\chi)^2}{L(s,\chi)}$, which encodes simple zeros as poles and interacts with twisted sums involving the arithmetical function $\ell(n)=(\Lambda*\log)(n)$. The authors establish equivalences between RH_sim, smoothed prime-sum criteria, and twisted-sum identities, and they derive explicit main-term formulas for twisted sums under RH_sim^\star and LH^\star, enabling a transfer of simple-zero information across characters. The results yield a robust criterion for the nonexistence of Siegel zeros and provide a mechanism to propagate information about simple zeros across the Dirichlet $L$-function family, with potential implications for zero-density estimates and GRH-related goals.

Abstract

For a primitive Dirichlet character $X$, a new hypothesis $RH_{sim}^\dagger[X]$ is introduced, which asserts that (1) all simple zeros of $L(s,X)$ in the critical strip are located on the critical line, and (2) these zeros satisfy some specific conditions on their vertical distribution. We show that $RH_{sim}^\dagger[X]$ (for any $X$) is a consequence of the generalized Riemann hypothesis. Assuming only the generalized Lindelöf hypothesis, we show that if $RH_{sim}^\dagger[X]$ holds for one primitive character $X$, then it holds for every such $X$. If this occurs, then for every character $χ$ (primitive or not), all simple zeros of $L(s,χ)$ in the critical strip are located on the critical line. In particular, Siegel zeros cannot exist in this situation.

A variant of the Linnik-Sprindzuk theorem for simple zeros of Dirichlet L-functions

TL;DR

The paper develops a Linnik–Sprindžuk–type framework for simple zeros of Dirichlet -functions by introducing RH_sim^\dagger and showing it is controlled by the generalized Lindelöf hypothesis LH^*. Under LH^*, RH_sim^\dagger for one primitive character implies RH_sim for all Dirichlet -functions, hence all simple zeros lie on the critical line and Siegel zeros are ruled out. Central to the approach is the auxiliary Dirichlet series , which encodes simple zeros as poles and interacts with twisted sums involving the arithmetical function . The authors establish equivalences between RH_sim, smoothed prime-sum criteria, and twisted-sum identities, and they derive explicit main-term formulas for twisted sums under RH_sim^\star and LH^\star, enabling a transfer of simple-zero information across characters. The results yield a robust criterion for the nonexistence of Siegel zeros and provide a mechanism to propagate information about simple zeros across the Dirichlet -function family, with potential implications for zero-density estimates and GRH-related goals.

Abstract

For a primitive Dirichlet character , a new hypothesis is introduced, which asserts that (1) all simple zeros of in the critical strip are located on the critical line, and (2) these zeros satisfy some specific conditions on their vertical distribution. We show that (for any ) is a consequence of the generalized Riemann hypothesis. Assuming only the generalized Lindelöf hypothesis, we show that if holds for one primitive character , then it holds for every such . If this occurs, then for every character (primitive or not), all simple zeros of in the critical strip are located on the critical line. In particular, Siegel zeros cannot exist in this situation.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 7 sections, 15 theorems, 117 equations, 1 figure.

Key Result

Lemma 2.1

Let $\mathcal{I}$ be a compact interval in $\mathbb{R}$. Uniformly for $c\in\mathcal{I}$ and $t\geqslant 1$, we have

Figures (1)

  • Figure 1:

Theorems & Definitions (28)

  • Remark
  • Lemma 2.1
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.2
  • proof
  • Theorem 2.3
  • Corollary 2.4
  • Corollary 2.5
  • Lemma 3.1
  • Remark
  • ...and 18 more