Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Normalisation for Negative Free Logics without and with Definite Descriptions

Nils Kürbis

TL;DR

This paper proves normalisation theorems for intuitionist and classical negative free logic, without and with the operator for definite descriptions, by an alternative formalisation of free logic building on an idea of Jaśkowski's.

Abstract

This paper proves normalisation theorems for intuitionist and classical negative free logic, without and with the $\invertediota$ operator for definite descriptions. Rules specific to free logic give rise to new kinds of maximal formulas additional to those familiar from standard intuitionist and classical logic. When $\invertediota$ is added it must be ensured that reduction procedures involving replacements of parameters by terms do not introduce new maximal formulas of higher degree than the ones removed. The problem is solved by a rule that permits restricting these terms in the rules for $\forall$, $\exists$ and $\invertediota$ to parameters or constants. A restricted subformula property for deductions in systems without $\invertediota$ is considered. It is improved upon by an alternative formalisation of free logic building on an idea of Jaśkowski's. In the classical system the rules for $\invertediota$ require treatment known from normalisation for classical logic with $\lor$ or $\exists$. The philosophical significance of the results is also indicated.

Normalisation for Negative Free Logics without and with Definite Descriptions

TL;DR

This paper proves normalisation theorems for intuitionist and classical negative free logic, without and with the operator for definite descriptions, by an alternative formalisation of free logic building on an idea of Jaśkowski's.

Abstract

This paper proves normalisation theorems for intuitionist and classical negative free logic, without and with the operator for definite descriptions. Rules specific to free logic give rise to new kinds of maximal formulas additional to those familiar from standard intuitionist and classical logic. When is added it must be ensured that reduction procedures involving replacements of parameters by terms do not introduce new maximal formulas of higher degree than the ones removed. The problem is solved by a rule that permits restricting these terms in the rules for , and to parameters or constants. A restricted subformula property for deductions in systems without is considered. It is improved upon by an alternative formalisation of free logic building on an idea of Jaśkowski's. In the classical system the rules for require treatment known from normalisation for classical logic with or . The philosophical significance of the results is also indicated.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 24 sections, 25 theorems.

Key Result

Lemma 1

$(=E)$ may be restricted to atomic conclusions.

Theorems & Definitions (68)

  • Definition 1
  • Definition 2
  • Lemma 1
  • proof
  • Lemma 2
  • proof
  • Definition 3
  • Definition 4
  • Definition 5
  • Definition 6
  • ...and 58 more