Table of Contents
Fetching ...

EFILN: The Electric Field Inversion-Localization Network for High-Precision Underwater Positioning

Yimian Ding, Jingzehua Xu, Guanwen Xie, Haoyu Wang, Weiyi Liu, Yi Li

TL;DR

The paper tackles precise underwater target localization using electric-field measurements by introducing EFILN, a deep neural network that inverts electric-field signals to 3D coordinates. It integrates physical principles through a Coulomb-law–based loss and employs a two-stage optimization strategy (Adam followed by L-BFGS) to achieve high-precision localization while demonstrating robustness to noise and strong small-sample learning. Key contributions include the first use of deep learning for Coulomb-law–driven electric-field inversion, robustness to environmental perturbations, and SSL capability, with open-source code to accelerate further research. The approach offers a practical, real-time solution for underwater positioning in complex environments and lays groundwork for validation with real-field data.

Abstract

Accurate underwater target localization is essential for underwater exploration. To improve accuracy and efficiency in complex underwater environments, we propose the Electric Field Inversion-Localization Network (EFILN), a deep feedforward neural network that reconstructs position coordinates from underwater electric field signals. By assessing whether the neural network's input-output values satisfy the Coulomb law, the error between the network's inversion solution and the equation's exact solution can be determined. The Adam optimizer was employed first, followed by the L-BFGS optimizer, to progressively improve the output precision of EFILN. A series of noise experiments demonstrated the robustness and practical utility of the proposed method, while small sample data experiments validated its strong small-sample learning (SSL) capabilities. To accelerate relevant research, we have made the codes available as open-source.

EFILN: The Electric Field Inversion-Localization Network for High-Precision Underwater Positioning

TL;DR

The paper tackles precise underwater target localization using electric-field measurements by introducing EFILN, a deep neural network that inverts electric-field signals to 3D coordinates. It integrates physical principles through a Coulomb-law–based loss and employs a two-stage optimization strategy (Adam followed by L-BFGS) to achieve high-precision localization while demonstrating robustness to noise and strong small-sample learning. Key contributions include the first use of deep learning for Coulomb-law–driven electric-field inversion, robustness to environmental perturbations, and SSL capability, with open-source code to accelerate further research. The approach offers a practical, real-time solution for underwater positioning in complex environments and lays groundwork for validation with real-field data.

Abstract

Accurate underwater target localization is essential for underwater exploration. To improve accuracy and efficiency in complex underwater environments, we propose the Electric Field Inversion-Localization Network (EFILN), a deep feedforward neural network that reconstructs position coordinates from underwater electric field signals. By assessing whether the neural network's input-output values satisfy the Coulomb law, the error between the network's inversion solution and the equation's exact solution can be determined. The Adam optimizer was employed first, followed by the L-BFGS optimizer, to progressively improve the output precision of EFILN. A series of noise experiments demonstrated the robustness and practical utility of the proposed method, while small sample data experiments validated its strong small-sample learning (SSL) capabilities. To accelerate relevant research, we have made the codes available as open-source.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 11 sections, 26 equations, 4 figures, 5 tables, 1 algorithm.

Figures (4)

  • Figure 1: Illustration of the underwater target localization scenario.
  • Figure 2: The overall architecture of our proposed EFILN algorithm.
  • Figure 3: Comparison of three-directional training loss under different noise levels: (a) x-direction's training loss (b) y-direction's training loss (c) z-direction's training loss.
  • Figure 4: Comparison of real and predicted trajectories under three different simulation paths: (a) spiral trajectory (b) circular trajectory (c) randomly selected points.