Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Testing the order of fractional integration when smooth deterministic trends are possibly present

Mustafa R. Kılınç, Michael Massmann

Abstract

This paper introduces a test for fractional integration in a model that possibly contains smooth deterministic trends. We model the trend component using a Chebyshev polynomial and specify the short-run dynamics semi-parametrically, accommodating a broad class of possibly nonlinear processes, including those with conditional heteroskedasticity. We use a local Whittle approach for constructing a Lagrange multiplier test statistic and for constructing a frequency-domain information criterion for the selection of the order of the Chebyshev polynomial. We show that widely used time-domain information criteria are generally inconsistent for the true order, whereas our frequency-domain criterion remains robust under both short- and long-memory behaviour. Monte Carlo simulations and an empirical application to the UK Great Ratios support our theoretical findings.

Testing the order of fractional integration when smooth deterministic trends are possibly present

Abstract

This paper introduces a test for fractional integration in a model that possibly contains smooth deterministic trends. We model the trend component using a Chebyshev polynomial and specify the short-run dynamics semi-parametrically, accommodating a broad class of possibly nonlinear processes, including those with conditional heteroskedasticity. We use a local Whittle approach for constructing a Lagrange multiplier test statistic and for constructing a frequency-domain information criterion for the selection of the order of the Chebyshev polynomial. We show that widely used time-domain information criteria are generally inconsistent for the true order, whereas our frequency-domain criterion remains robust under both short- and long-memory behaviour. Monte Carlo simulations and an empirical application to the UK Great Ratios support our theoretical findings.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 19 sections, 9 theorems, 174 equations, 5 figures, 49 tables.

Key Result

Theorem 2.1

Let $y_t$ be generated according to eq1-eq21 and let Assumption ass2 hold. The bandwidth $m$ satisfies the conditions in Assumption bandw and $T^{1-2\delta_0} \ln(m) m^{- 1/2} \rightarrow \infty$. Then for any $k < k_0$ with $k_0 > 0$ and any $\delta_0 \in (-0.5,0.5)$, under $H_0 : \delta = \delta_0$. If, moreover, $T^{1-2\delta_0} m^{-1} \rightarrow \infty$, then under $H_0 : \delta = \delt

Figures (5)

  • Figure 1: Simulated rejection frequencies of $H_0 : \delta = 0$, averaged over 5,000 replications. The DGP sets $k_0 = 0$ with $\beta_{0,0} = 0$, while $\epsilon_t \sim \text{NIID}(0,1)$ and $\delta_0 \in [-0.499, 0.499]$. The model is given by $y_t = \beta_0 + \Delta^{-\delta} \epsilon_t$ when $k = 0$, and by $y_t = \beta_0 + \beta_1 P_t(1) + \Delta^{-\delta} \epsilon_t$ when $k = 1$. The LM-statistic is based on the OLS residuals $\hat{u}_t (k)$ in \ref{['res']}.
  • Figure 2: Simulated rejection frequencies of $H_0 : \delta = 0$, averaged over 5,000 replications. The DGP sets $k_0 = 1$ with $\beta_{0,0} = 0$ and $\beta_{1,0} = 1$, while $\epsilon_t \sim \text{NIID}(0,1)$ and $\delta_0 \in [-0.499, 0.499]$. The model is given by $y_t = \beta_0 + \Delta^{-\delta} \epsilon_t$ when $k = 0$, and by $y_t = \beta_0 + \beta_1 P_t(1) + \Delta^{-\delta} \epsilon_t$ when $k = 1$. The LM-statistic is based on the OLS residuals $\hat{u}_t (k)$ in \ref{['res']}.
  • Figure 3: Simulated rejection frequencies of $H_0 : \delta = 0$, averaged over 5,000 replications. The DGP sets $k_0 = 1$ with $\beta_{0,0} = 0$ and $\beta_{1,0} = 1$, while $\epsilon_t \sim \text{NIID}(0,1)$ and $\delta_0 \in [-0.499, 0.499]$. The model is given by $y_t = \sum_{n = 0}^k \beta_n P_t (n) + \Delta^{-\delta} \epsilon_t$ with the order $k$ selected by either the usual time-domain HQ information criterion, the infeasible $\delta$-HQ criterion or our LW-HQ criterion. The correct specification with $k = k_0$ is included as a benchmark. The LM-statistic is based on the OLS residuals $\hat{u}_t (k)$ in \ref{['res']}. For LW-HQ, the bandwidth is fixed at $m = \left\lfloor T^{0.65} \right\rfloor$.
  • Figure 4: Histograms of the estimated Chebyshev polynomial order selected by three HQ-type information criteria. The DGP is as in \ref{['eq1']}--\ref{['eq21']} with $u_t = \Delta^{-\delta_0} \eta_t$, where $\eta_t \sim \text{NIID}(0,1)$ and $\delta_0 \in \{-0.3, 0, 0.35, 0.45\}$. The true Chebyshev polynomial is specified by $k_0 = 1$, $\beta_{0,0} = 0$ and $\beta_{1,0} = 1$. The selection frequencies are averaged across 5,000 replications. The results for the time domain HQ criterion are shown in red, those for the infeasible $\delta$-HQ criterion proposed by lavielle2000least in green, and for our LW-HQ criterion in magenta. For LW-HQ we fix the bandwidth $m = \left\lfloor T^{0.65} \right\rfloor$.
  • Figure 5: Logged UK Great Ratios. Dotted lines show the estimated deterministic component $\sum_{n=0}^{\hat{k}}\hat{\beta}_n P_t(n)$ with the order $\hat{k}$ selected by time domain BIC (black) and frequency-domain LW-BIC (red).

Theorems & Definitions (18)

  • Theorem 2.1
  • Theorem 2.2
  • Theorem 2.3
  • Theorem 2.4
  • Theorem 2.5
  • Lemma A.1
  • proof
  • Lemma A.2
  • proof
  • Lemma A.3
  • ...and 8 more