Unlearn and Burn: Adversarial Machine Unlearning Requests Destroy Model Accuracy
Yangsibo Huang, Daogao Liu, Lynn Chua, Badih Ghazi, Pritish Kamath, Ravi Kumar, Pasin Manurangsi, Milad Nasr, Amer Sinha, Chiyuan Zhang
TL;DR
This work reveals a critical vulnerability in machine unlearning by showing that adversarial forget sets not drawn from the training data can catastrophically degrade a model after unlearning. It introduces a threat model with white-box and black-box attack methods that compute adversarial forget sets via gradient-through-unlearning and zeroth-order estimation, and validates them on CIFAR-10 and ImageNet against GA-family unlearning methods. The results show dramatic accuracy losses (white-box: CIFAR-10 ~3.6%, ImageNet ~0.4%; black-box: CIFAR-10 ~8.5%, ImageNet ~1.3%) and reveal transferability across models, highlighting significant robustness gaps. Defensive analyses demonstrate that existing verification schemes struggle to reliably detect adversarial requests, especially under stealthy perturbations, underscoring an urgent need for stronger request verification and secure unlearning protocols for practical deployment.
Abstract
Machine unlearning algorithms, designed for selective removal of training data from models, have emerged as a promising approach to growing privacy concerns. In this work, we expose a critical yet underexplored vulnerability in the deployment of unlearning systems: the assumption that the data requested for removal is always part of the original training set. We present a threat model where an attacker can degrade model accuracy by submitting adversarial unlearning requests for data not present in the training set. We propose white-box and black-box attack algorithms and evaluate them through a case study on image classification tasks using the CIFAR-10 and ImageNet datasets, targeting a family of widely used unlearning methods. Our results show extremely poor test accuracy following the attack: 3.6% on CIFAR-10 and 0.4% on ImageNet for white-box attacks, and 8.5% on CIFAR-10 and 1.3% on ImageNet for black-box attacks. Additionally, we evaluate various verification mechanisms to detect the legitimacy of unlearning requests and reveal the challenges in verification, as most of the mechanisms fail to detect stealthy attacks without severely impairing their ability to process valid requests. These findings underscore the urgent need for research on more robust request verification methods and unlearning protocols, should the deployment of machine unlearning systems become more prevalent in the future.
