Table of Contents
Fetching ...

On the existence and classification of $k$-Yamabe gradient solitons

Maria Fernanda Espinal, Mariel Sáez

Abstract

In this paper we classify rotationally symmetric conformally flat admissible solitons to the $k$-Yamabe flow, a fully non-linear version of the Yamabe flow. For $n\geq 2k$ we prove existence of complete expanding, steady and shrinking solitons and describe their asymptotic behavior at infinity. For $n<2k$ we prove that steady and expanding solitons are not admissible. The proof is based on the careful analysis of an associated dynamical system.

On the existence and classification of $k$-Yamabe gradient solitons

Abstract

In this paper we classify rotationally symmetric conformally flat admissible solitons to the -Yamabe flow, a fully non-linear version of the Yamabe flow. For we prove existence of complete expanding, steady and shrinking solitons and describe their asymptotic behavior at infinity. For we prove that steady and expanding solitons are not admissible. The proof is based on the careful analysis of an associated dynamical system.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 31 sections, 34 theorems, 216 equations, 2 figures.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

Let $g_{u}$ defined by Then $g_{u}$ is a conformally flat rotationally symmetric $k$-Yamabe gradient soliton with $\sigma_{k}(g_{u})>0$ if and only if $u$ is a smooth radial solution to the elliptic equation where $\theta$ is a parameter that satisfies $2\theta+\rho>0$. Equation elliptic_equation equivalent to where $T_{k-1}$ is the $(k-1)$-th Newton tensor evaluated on the Schouten tensor $g_{

Figures (2)

  • Figure 4.1: Admissible regions in terms of $\rho$ and $\theta$ when $n>2k$.
  • Figure 5.1:

Theorems & Definitions (64)

  • Theorem 1.1: PDE formulation of $k$-Yamabe gradient solitons
  • Theorem 1.2: Existence of radial $k$-Yamabe gradient solitons for $n\geq 2k$
  • Theorem 1.3: Asymptotic behavior
  • Theorem 1.4: Non-existence of radial $k$-Yamabe gradient solitons for $n<2k$
  • Proposition 2.1
  • Proposition 2.2
  • Proposition 2.3: Lemma 4.4 in del2005singular
  • proof : Proof of Theorem \ref{['PDE_formulation']}
  • Claim 1
  • Lemma 3.1
  • ...and 54 more