Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Equivariant Homotopy Theory via Simplicial Coalgebras

Sofía Martínez Alberga, Manuel Rivera

TL;DR

The paper advances the program of modeling $G$-spaces at the chain level by extending the RR22 coalgebraic framework to the $G$-equivariant setting, with coefficients in an algebraically closed field and then in perfect fields. It introduces $G$-fixed-point and orbit-diagram model structures, and proves Elmendorf-type Quillen equivalences that relate $G$-spaces to $G$-connected simplicial cocommutative coalgebras via the equivariant chains functor. The main contributions include a $G$-equivariant full and faithful embedding of $G$-spaces up to $G$-$\pi_1$-$\mathbb{F}$-equivalence into $G$-coalgebras, a parallel embedding for a linearized quasi-categorical notion, and a rationalization interpretation in the perfect-field setting. These results provide a robust algebraic framework for extracting invariants of $G$-spaces and set the stage for practical computations of topological and geometric data in equivariant contexts, including extensions to rational homotopy theory via fixed points.

Abstract

Given a commutative ring $R$, a $π_1$-$R$-equivalence is a continuous map of spaces inducing an isomorphism on fundamental groups and an $R$-homology equivalence between universal covers. When $R$ is an algebraically closed field, Raptis and Rivera described a full and faithful model for the homotopy theory of spaces up to $π_1$-$R$-equivalence by means of simplicial coalgebras considered up to a notion of weak equivalence created by a localized version of the Cobar functor. In this article, we prove a $G$-equivariant analog of this statement using a generalization of a celebrated theorem of Elmendorf. We also prove a more general result about modeling $G$-simplicial sets considered under a linearized version of quasi-categorical equivalence in terms of simplicial coalgebras.

Equivariant Homotopy Theory via Simplicial Coalgebras

TL;DR

The paper advances the program of modeling -spaces at the chain level by extending the RR22 coalgebraic framework to the -equivariant setting, with coefficients in an algebraically closed field and then in perfect fields. It introduces -fixed-point and orbit-diagram model structures, and proves Elmendorf-type Quillen equivalences that relate -spaces to -connected simplicial cocommutative coalgebras via the equivariant chains functor. The main contributions include a -equivariant full and faithful embedding of -spaces up to ---equivalence into -coalgebras, a parallel embedding for a linearized quasi-categorical notion, and a rationalization interpretation in the perfect-field setting. These results provide a robust algebraic framework for extracting invariants of -spaces and set the stage for practical computations of topological and geometric data in equivariant contexts, including extensions to rational homotopy theory via fixed points.

Abstract

Given a commutative ring , a --equivalence is a continuous map of spaces inducing an isomorphism on fundamental groups and an -homology equivalence between universal covers. When is an algebraically closed field, Raptis and Rivera described a full and faithful model for the homotopy theory of spaces up to --equivalence by means of simplicial coalgebras considered up to a notion of weak equivalence created by a localized version of the Cobar functor. In this article, we prove a -equivariant analog of this statement using a generalization of a celebrated theorem of Elmendorf. We also prove a more general result about modeling -simplicial sets considered under a linearized version of quasi-categorical equivalence in terms of simplicial coalgebras.
Paper Structure (10 sections, 22 theorems, 66 equations, 1 figure)

This paper contains 10 sections, 22 theorems, 66 equations, 1 figure.

Key Result

Theorem 1

Let $G$ be a group and $R$ a commutative ring.

Figures (1)

  • Figure 2.1: Functors in Definition \ref{['def2.2.1']}

Theorems & Definitions (40)

  • Theorem 1
  • Definition 2.1.1
  • Proposition 2.1.2
  • Theorem 2.1.3
  • Definition 2.2.1
  • Proposition 2.2.2
  • Theorem 2.2.3
  • Definition 2.3.1
  • Definition 2.3.2
  • Theorem 2.3.3
  • ...and 30 more