Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Social Choice for Heterogeneous Fairness in Recommendation

Amanda Aird, Elena Štefancová, Cassidy All, Amy Voida, Martin Homola, Nicholas Mattei, Robin Burke

TL;DR

This work approaches recommendation fairness from the standpoint of computational social choice, using a multi-agent framework and demonstrates the successful integration of multiple, heterogeneous fairness definitions across multiple data sets.

Abstract

Algorithmic fairness in recommender systems requires close attention to the needs of a diverse set of stakeholders that may have competing interests. Previous work in this area has often been limited by fixed, single-objective definitions of fairness, built into algorithms or optimization criteria that are applied to a single fairness dimension or, at most, applied identically across dimensions. These narrow conceptualizations limit the ability to adapt fairness-aware solutions to the wide range of stakeholder needs and fairness definitions that arise in practice. Our work approaches recommendation fairness from the standpoint of computational social choice, using a multi-agent framework. In this paper, we explore the properties of different social choice mechanisms and demonstrate the successful integration of multiple, heterogeneous fairness definitions across multiple data sets.

Social Choice for Heterogeneous Fairness in Recommendation

TL;DR

This work approaches recommendation fairness from the standpoint of computational social choice, using a multi-agent framework and demonstrates the successful integration of multiple, heterogeneous fairness definitions across multiple data sets.

Abstract

Algorithmic fairness in recommender systems requires close attention to the needs of a diverse set of stakeholders that may have competing interests. Previous work in this area has often been limited by fixed, single-objective definitions of fairness, built into algorithms or optimization criteria that are applied to a single fairness dimension or, at most, applied identically across dimensions. These narrow conceptualizations limit the ability to adapt fairness-aware solutions to the wide range of stakeholder needs and fairness definitions that arise in practice. Our work approaches recommendation fairness from the standpoint of computational social choice, using a multi-agent framework. In this paper, we explore the properties of different social choice mechanisms and demonstrate the successful integration of multiple, heterogeneous fairness definitions across multiple data sets.
Paper Structure (10 sections, 1 figure)

This paper contains 10 sections, 1 figure.

Figures (1)

  • Figure 1: nDCG vs $l_{1/2}$ Fairness Norm for Microlending (Left) and Movies (Right).