Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Persona Knowledge-Aligned Prompt Tuning Method for Online Debate

Chunkit Chan, Cheng Jiayang, Xin Liu, Yauwai Yim, Yuxin Jiang, Zheye Deng, Haoran Li, Yangqiu Song, Ginny Y. Wong, Simon See

TL;DR

This work proposes a persona knowledge-aligned framework for argument quality assessment tasks from the audience side and is the first work that leverages the emergence of ChatGPT and injects such audience personae knowledge into smaller language models via prompt tuning.

Abstract

Debate is the process of exchanging viewpoints or convincing others on a particular issue. Recent research has provided empirical evidence that the persuasiveness of an argument is determined not only by language usage but also by communicator characteristics. Researchers have paid much attention to aspects of languages, such as linguistic features and discourse structures, but combining argument persuasiveness and impact with the social personae of the audience has not been explored due to the difficulty and complexity. We have observed the impressive simulation and personification capability of ChatGPT, indicating a giant pre-trained language model may function as an individual to provide personae and exert unique influences based on diverse background knowledge. Therefore, we propose a persona knowledge-aligned framework for argument quality assessment tasks from the audience side. This is the first work that leverages the emergence of ChatGPT and injects such audience personae knowledge into smaller language models via prompt tuning. The performance of our pipeline demonstrates significant and consistent improvement compared to competitive architectures.

Persona Knowledge-Aligned Prompt Tuning Method for Online Debate

TL;DR

This work proposes a persona knowledge-aligned framework for argument quality assessment tasks from the audience side and is the first work that leverages the emergence of ChatGPT and injects such audience personae knowledge into smaller language models via prompt tuning.

Abstract

Debate is the process of exchanging viewpoints or convincing others on a particular issue. Recent research has provided empirical evidence that the persuasiveness of an argument is determined not only by language usage but also by communicator characteristics. Researchers have paid much attention to aspects of languages, such as linguistic features and discourse structures, but combining argument persuasiveness and impact with the social personae of the audience has not been explored due to the difficulty and complexity. We have observed the impressive simulation and personification capability of ChatGPT, indicating a giant pre-trained language model may function as an individual to provide personae and exert unique influences based on diverse background knowledge. Therefore, we propose a persona knowledge-aligned framework for argument quality assessment tasks from the audience side. This is the first work that leverages the emergence of ChatGPT and injects such audience personae knowledge into smaller language models via prompt tuning. The performance of our pipeline demonstrates significant and consistent improvement compared to competitive architectures.
Paper Structure (51 sections, 4 equations, 14 figures, 10 tables)

This paper contains 51 sections, 4 equations, 14 figures, 10 tables.

Figures (14)

  • Figure 1: A data example from Kialo and diverse audience personas generated by ChatGPT on this online debate topic. The Context indicates the previous historical arguments from other users. The Argument indicates the current argument or statement from the users.
  • Figure 2: The upper portion is a prompt template for eliciting the persona knowledge from ChatGPT, and the bottom portion is the randomized instruction generator.
  • Figure 3: Human validation of five aspects of persona knowledge elicited from ChatGPT. The human evaluation score for the Harmfulness aspect is zero, indicating that no harmful or toxic language is found in the 1,000 sampled personae, which is omitted from the figure.
  • Figure 4: Overview of the PresonaPrompt framework.
  • Figure 5: F1 scores of different models on varying the context numbers. The results of HAN, Flat, and Interval-RoBERTa are referenced from DBLP:conf/acl/LiuOSJ20. The distinguishing factor among these models lies in the form of context modeling.
  • ...and 9 more figures