Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Construction and Conditions for Completely Independent Spanning Trees in Hypercubes and Regular Bipartite Graphs

R. Barabde, S. A. Mane, S. A. Kandekar

TL;DR

The paper investigates completely independent spanning trees (CISTs) in hypercubes and related bipartite graphs, addressing Hasunuma's conjecture. It establishes a practical necessary condition for the existence of $\big\lfloor \frac{k}{2} \big\rfloor$ CISTs in $k$-regular, $k$-connected bipartite graphs, and uses it to show nonexistence of $\frac{n}{2}$ CISTs in the even-dimension hypercube $Q_n$ for $2< n \le 10^7$ except for a small set of exceptional values, thereby refuting Hasunuma's conjecture in most even dimensions. The authors also construct three CISTs in $Q_n$ for every $n \ge 7$ via an inductive approach starting from an explicit $\{T_1,T_2,T_3\}$ in $Q_7$, with quantified diameter bounds. Collectively, these results sharpen the understanding of CIST existence in hypercubes, offer fault-tolerant routing implications, and pose open questions about odd dimensions and broader graph classes.

Abstract

A set of \( k \) spanning trees in a graph \( G \) is called a set of \textit{completely independent spanning trees (CISTs)} if, for every pair of vertices \( x \) and \( y \), the paths connecting \( x \) and \( y \) across different trees do not share any vertices or edges, except for \( x \) and \( y \) themselves. Hasunuma conjectured that every \(2k\)-connected graph contains exactly \(k\) completely independent spanning trees (CISTs). However, Pétérfalvi disproved this conjecture. When \( k = 2 \), the two CISTs are called a \textit{dual-CIST}. It has been shown that determining whether a graph can have \( k \) CISTs is an NP-complete problem, even when \( k = 2 \). In $2017$, Darties et al. raised the question of whether the $6-$dimensional hypercube \( Q_6 \) can have three completely independent spanning trees (CISTs). This paper provides an answer to that question. In this paper, we first present a necessary condition for \( k \)-regular, \( k \)-connected bipartite graphs to have \( \left\lfloor \frac{k}{2} \right\rfloor \) CISTs. We also investigate that the hypercube of dimension \( n \) cannot have \( \frac{n}{2} \) CISTs, which means Hasunuma's conjecture does not hold for the hypercube \( Q_n \) when \( n \) is an even integer \(2 < n \leq 10^7 \), except when \(n = 2^r\) and \( n \in \{161038, 215326, 2568226, 3020626, 7866046, 9115426 \} \). This result also resolves a question posed by Darties et al. The construction of multiple CISTs on the underlying graph of a network has practical applications in ensuring the fault tolerance of data transmission. In this context, we also provide a construction for three completely independent spanning trees in the hypercube \(Q_n\) for \(n \geq 7\). Our results show that Hasunuma's conjecture holds for odd integer \(n = 7\) in \(Q_n\), but does not hold for even integer \(n = 6\).

Construction and Conditions for Completely Independent Spanning Trees in Hypercubes and Regular Bipartite Graphs

TL;DR

The paper investigates completely independent spanning trees (CISTs) in hypercubes and related bipartite graphs, addressing Hasunuma's conjecture. It establishes a practical necessary condition for the existence of CISTs in -regular, -connected bipartite graphs, and uses it to show nonexistence of CISTs in the even-dimension hypercube for except for a small set of exceptional values, thereby refuting Hasunuma's conjecture in most even dimensions. The authors also construct three CISTs in for every via an inductive approach starting from an explicit in , with quantified diameter bounds. Collectively, these results sharpen the understanding of CIST existence in hypercubes, offer fault-tolerant routing implications, and pose open questions about odd dimensions and broader graph classes.

Abstract

A set of spanning trees in a graph is called a set of \textit{completely independent spanning trees (CISTs)} if, for every pair of vertices and , the paths connecting and across different trees do not share any vertices or edges, except for and themselves. Hasunuma conjectured that every -connected graph contains exactly completely independent spanning trees (CISTs). However, Pétérfalvi disproved this conjecture. When , the two CISTs are called a \textit{dual-CIST}. It has been shown that determining whether a graph can have CISTs is an NP-complete problem, even when . In , Darties et al. raised the question of whether the dimensional hypercube can have three completely independent spanning trees (CISTs). This paper provides an answer to that question. In this paper, we first present a necessary condition for -regular, -connected bipartite graphs to have CISTs. We also investigate that the hypercube of dimension cannot have CISTs, which means Hasunuma's conjecture does not hold for the hypercube when is an even integer , except when and . This result also resolves a question posed by Darties et al. The construction of multiple CISTs on the underlying graph of a network has practical applications in ensuring the fault tolerance of data transmission. In this context, we also provide a construction for three completely independent spanning trees in the hypercube for . Our results show that Hasunuma's conjecture holds for odd integer in , but does not hold for even integer .
Paper Structure (7 sections, 6 theorems, 19 equations, 4 figures, 1 algorithm)

This paper contains 7 sections, 6 theorems, 19 equations, 4 figures, 1 algorithm.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

p1 Let $G$ be a $k$-connected, $k$-regular graph. If $G$ admits $\lfloor \frac{k}{2} \rfloor$ CISTs, then the following condition holds

Figures (4)

  • Figure 1: Hypercubes of dimension 1, 2, and 3
  • Figure 2: $T_1:$ First CIST in $Q_7$ with diameter 15
  • Figure 3: $T_2$: Second CIST in Q7 with diameter 18
  • Figure 4: $T_3$: Third CIST in Q7 with diameter 17

Theorems & Definitions (11)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Theorem 3.1
  • proof
  • Lemma 4.1
  • proof
  • proof
  • Theorem 5.1: h1
  • Corollary 6.1: sm
  • Definition 6.2: we
  • Theorem 6.3
  • ...and 1 more