Table of Contents
Fetching ...

A Comparative Analysis of Relativistic Particle Pushers vis-à-vis Computation Time & Accuracy

Mohammad Yasir, Vikrant Saxena

Abstract

The performance of relativistic particle pushers has long been a topic of interest in the field of computational plasma physics, particularly from the point of view of the particle-in-cell approach. Previous works undertaken to compare such integrators have predominantly targeted the ultra-relativistic regime. In this paper, we utilize a custom-built code to study the core run-times of the Boris, the Vay, and the Higuera-Cary particle pushers for low-, high-, and ultra-relativistic particles. This is followed by a comparison of the three integrators in terms of accuracy and error. A fitness parameter is then proposed that can serve as a one-stop value to determine which method is more suitable for a particular simulation setup. It is hoped that through knowledge of such intricacies, the choice for the integrator will be easier to make depending on the problem at hand.

A Comparative Analysis of Relativistic Particle Pushers vis-à-vis Computation Time & Accuracy

Abstract

The performance of relativistic particle pushers has long been a topic of interest in the field of computational plasma physics, particularly from the point of view of the particle-in-cell approach. Previous works undertaken to compare such integrators have predominantly targeted the ultra-relativistic regime. In this paper, we utilize a custom-built code to study the core run-times of the Boris, the Vay, and the Higuera-Cary particle pushers for low-, high-, and ultra-relativistic particles. This is followed by a comparison of the three integrators in terms of accuracy and error. A fitness parameter is then proposed that can serve as a one-stop value to determine which method is more suitable for a particular simulation setup. It is hoped that through knowledge of such intricacies, the choice for the integrator will be easier to make depending on the problem at hand.
Paper Structure (23 sections, 11 equations, 19 figures, 5 tables)

This paper contains 23 sections, 11 equations, 19 figures, 5 tables.

Figures (19)

  • Figure 1: Demonstrative graphics for the staggered updates followed by leapfrog integrators.
  • Figure 2: Core runtimes (s) of Boris, Vay, and Higuera-Cary integrators. Solid lines correspond to average run-time, while faint dotted lines show the individual runs. The reader is advised to refer to the online version of this text for improved visibility.
  • Figure 3: Configuration space plots in microns for the uniform magnetic field in the LR regime.
  • Figure 4: Relative Gamma and absolute phase errors (rad) for magnetic gyration in the LR regime. The slight wave in HC phase error stems out of the sinusoidal nature of the trajectory.
  • Figure 5: Gyroradius errors ($\times 10^{-3}$) for the uniform magnetic field in the LR regime.
  • ...and 14 more figures