Table of Contents
Fetching ...

First-order definability of Darmon points in number fields

Juan Pablo De Rasis, Hunter Handley

TL;DR

The paper advances the understanding of first-order definability for Darmon points over number fields by constructing a uniform, first-order description of these points on $\mathbb{P}^1_K$ and showing a path to reduce quantifier complexity in special cases. It develops a coherent framework linking Campana orbifolds, quaternion algebras, and Diophantine sets to define Darmon points via valuations outside a fixed set of places, and provides explicit quantifier counts and degree bounds for the defining polynomials. Key contributions include a universal $ orall\exists\forall$-definition for the Darmon-point filtrations $D_{K,S,n}$, a simpler $\forall\exists$-definition when $S=\Omega_K^{\infty}$, and a detailed analysis of formula complexity, with conditional results toward further quantifier reduction. The work has implications for Hilbert’s Tenth Problem over number fields by offering concrete, parameter-uniform Diophantine descriptions that connect arithmetic geometry with logical definability, and lays groundwork for possible further refinements under additional uniformity assumptions.

Abstract

For a given number field $K$, we give a $\forall\exists\forall$-first order description of affine Darmon points over $\mathbb{P}^1_K$, and show that this can be improved to a $\forall\exists$-definition in a remarkable particular case. Darmon points, which are a geometric generalization of perfect powers, constitute a non-linear set-theoretical filtration between $K$ and its ring of $S$-integers, the latter of which can be defined with universal formulas, as has been progressively proven by Koenigsmann, Park, and Eisenträger & Morrison. We also show that our formulas are uniform with respect to all possible $S$, with a parameter-free uniformity, and we compute the number of quantifiers and a bound for the degree of the defining polynomial.

First-order definability of Darmon points in number fields

TL;DR

The paper advances the understanding of first-order definability for Darmon points over number fields by constructing a uniform, first-order description of these points on and showing a path to reduce quantifier complexity in special cases. It develops a coherent framework linking Campana orbifolds, quaternion algebras, and Diophantine sets to define Darmon points via valuations outside a fixed set of places, and provides explicit quantifier counts and degree bounds for the defining polynomials. Key contributions include a universal -definition for the Darmon-point filtrations , a simpler -definition when , and a detailed analysis of formula complexity, with conditional results toward further quantifier reduction. The work has implications for Hilbert’s Tenth Problem over number fields by offering concrete, parameter-uniform Diophantine descriptions that connect arithmetic geometry with logical definability, and lays groundwork for possible further refinements under additional uniformity assumptions.

Abstract

For a given number field , we give a -first order description of affine Darmon points over , and show that this can be improved to a -definition in a remarkable particular case. Darmon points, which are a geometric generalization of perfect powers, constitute a non-linear set-theoretical filtration between and its ring of -integers, the latter of which can be defined with universal formulas, as has been progressively proven by Koenigsmann, Park, and Eisenträger & Morrison. We also show that our formulas are uniform with respect to all possible , with a parameter-free uniformity, and we compute the number of quantifiers and a bound for the degree of the defining polynomial.
Paper Structure (14 sections, 25 theorems, 27 equations)

This paper contains 14 sections, 25 theorems, 27 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

Let $K$ be a number field and $S$ be a finite set of places of $K$ containing the archimedean ones. If $n\in\mathbb{Z}_{\geq 1}$, the set is $\forall \exists \forall$-definable in $K$, uniformly with respect to all possible such $S$. Moreover, the formula involves $2$ initial universal quantifiers, then $171$ existential quantifiers, and another $426$ universal quantifiers. The defining polynomial

Theorems & Definitions (28)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Theorem 1.2
  • Theorem 1.3
  • Definition 3.1
  • Definition 3.2
  • Lemma 3.3
  • Corollary 3.4
  • Proposition 4.1
  • Theorem 4.2
  • Definition 4.3
  • ...and 18 more