Non-Asymptotic Analysis of Classical Spectrum Estimators with $L$-mixing Time-series Data
Yuping Zheng, Andrew Lamperski
TL;DR
The paper addresses non-asymptotic error analysis for classical non-parametric spectral estimators under $L$-mixing time-series data, deriving finite-sample bounds for the Bartlett and Welch methods. It develops a general stochastic-approximation framework and proves variance and bias bounds, plus high-probability results, that hold beyond Gaussian or ARMA-type assumptions and apply to a broad class of processes, including nonlinear and geometrically ergodic Markov chains. The key contributions are the non-asymptotic bounds with explicit dependence on mixing quantities, the extension of L-mixing properties to spectral data matrices, and simulations validating the theory on a finite-state Markov chain. The results bridge the gap between practical finite-sample spectral estimation and rigorous non-asymptotic guarantees, enabling more reliable performance assessment in dependent-data settings.
Abstract
Spectral estimation is a fundamental problem for time series analysis, which is widely applied in economics, speech analysis, seismology, and control systems. The asymptotic convergence theory for classical, non-parametric estimators, is well-understood, but the non-asymptotic theory is still rather limited. Our recent work gave the first non-asymptotic error bounds on the well-known Bartlett and Welch methods, but under restrictive assumptions. In this paper, we derive non-asymptotic error bounds for a class of non-parametric spectral estimators, which includes the classical Bartlett and Welch methods, under the assumption that the data is an $L$-mixing stochastic process. A broad range of processes arising in time-series analysis, such as autoregressive processes and measurements of geometrically ergodic Markov chains, can be shown to be $L$-mixing. In particular, $L$-mixing processes can model a variety of nonlinear phenomena which do not satisfy the assumptions of our prior work. Our new error bounds for $L$-mixing processes match the error bounds in the restrictive settings from prior work up to logarithmic factors.
