Table of Contents
Fetching ...

ACE: A LLM-based Negotiation Coaching System

Ryan Shea, Aymen Kallala, Xin Lucy Liu, Michael W. Morris, Zhou Yu

TL;DR

ACE tackles the accessibility gap in negotiation training by deploying an LLM-based coaching assistant that combines a curriculum-informed annotation scheme with targeted preparation and negotiation feedback. Built on a dataset of MBA negotiation transcripts, ACE identifies user mistakes and provides actionable guidance through both turn-based and holistic feedback, guided by dynamic prompting and a robust negotiation agent. Large-scale user studies show that ACE significantly enhances both objective negotiation outcomes and subjective learning metrics compared with no feedback and alternative feedback methods. This work advances democratized, curriculum-aligned negotiation education and offers a framework for feedback-driven negotiation tutoring using LLMs.

Abstract

The growing prominence of LLMs has led to an increase in the development of AI tutoring systems. These systems are crucial in providing underrepresented populations with improved access to valuable education. One important area of education that is unavailable to many learners is strategic bargaining related to negotiation. To address this, we develop a LLM-based Assistant for Coaching nEgotiation (ACE). ACE not only serves as a negotiation partner for users but also provides them with targeted feedback for improvement. To build our system, we collect a dataset of negotiation transcripts between MBA students. These transcripts come from trained negotiators and emulate realistic bargaining scenarios. We use the dataset, along with expert consultations, to design an annotation scheme for detecting negotiation mistakes. ACE employs this scheme to identify mistakes and provide targeted feedback to users. To test the effectiveness of ACE-generated feedback, we conducted a user experiment with two consecutive trials of negotiation and found that it improves negotiation performances significantly compared to a system that doesn't provide feedback and one which uses an alternative method of providing feedback.

ACE: A LLM-based Negotiation Coaching System

TL;DR

ACE tackles the accessibility gap in negotiation training by deploying an LLM-based coaching assistant that combines a curriculum-informed annotation scheme with targeted preparation and negotiation feedback. Built on a dataset of MBA negotiation transcripts, ACE identifies user mistakes and provides actionable guidance through both turn-based and holistic feedback, guided by dynamic prompting and a robust negotiation agent. Large-scale user studies show that ACE significantly enhances both objective negotiation outcomes and subjective learning metrics compared with no feedback and alternative feedback methods. This work advances democratized, curriculum-aligned negotiation education and offers a framework for feedback-driven negotiation tutoring using LLMs.

Abstract

The growing prominence of LLMs has led to an increase in the development of AI tutoring systems. These systems are crucial in providing underrepresented populations with improved access to valuable education. One important area of education that is unavailable to many learners is strategic bargaining related to negotiation. To address this, we develop a LLM-based Assistant for Coaching nEgotiation (ACE). ACE not only serves as a negotiation partner for users but also provides them with targeted feedback for improvement. To build our system, we collect a dataset of negotiation transcripts between MBA students. These transcripts come from trained negotiators and emulate realistic bargaining scenarios. We use the dataset, along with expert consultations, to design an annotation scheme for detecting negotiation mistakes. ACE employs this scheme to identify mistakes and provide targeted feedback to users. To test the effectiveness of ACE-generated feedback, we conducted a user experiment with two consecutive trials of negotiation and found that it improves negotiation performances significantly compared to a system that doesn't provide feedback and one which uses an alternative method of providing feedback.
Paper Structure (32 sections, 3 equations, 12 figures, 20 tables)

This paper contains 32 sections, 3 equations, 12 figures, 20 tables.

Figures (12)

  • Figure 1: Diagram illustrating the turn-based feedback flow for ACE as well as an example of holistic feedback.
  • Figure 2: Experiment diagram, we designed our experiment in Qualtrics.
  • Figure 3: Experiment diagram for Pilot Study A, we designed our experiment in Qualtrics.
  • Figure 4: Honda scenario for the buyer.
  • Figure 5: Honda scenario for the seller.
  • ...and 7 more figures