Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Positivity on simple $G$-varieties

Praveen Kumar Roy, Pinakinath Saha

TL;DR

The paper addresses positivity for vector bundles on nonsingular simple $G$-projective varieties by reducing ampleness and nefness to restrictions on $B$-stable curves, and then computes precise Seshadri constants at the sink $x^-$ of such varieties. It establishes a nefness criterion for $ obreak \Gamma$-equivariant bundles via curve restrictions, and analyzes the geometry of the blow-up at the sink to describe nef and Mori cones explicitly. Concrete formulas are derived: for any ample line bundle $L=\\sum_i a_i D_i$, The Seshadri constant at $x^-$ is $\\varepsilon(L;x^-) = \\min_i a_i$, and for a $B$-equivariant nef vector bundle $E$, $\\varepsilon(E;x^-) = \\min_{i,C} a_i(C)$ where $E|_C$ splits on finitely many $B$-stable curves through $x^-$. These results yield a practical pathway to compute local positivity and Seshadri constants in the presence of group actions, with explicit instances for flag varieties and related simple $G$-varieties.

Abstract

Let $X$ be a normal projective variety equipped with an action of a semisimple algebraic group $G$, and assume that $X$ contains a unique closed orbit. Let $B$ be a Borel subgroup of $G$ and let $E$ be a $B$-equivariant vector bundle on $X$. In this article, we prove that $E$ is ample (respectively, nef) if and only if its restriction to the finite set of $B$-stable curves in $X$ is ample (respectively, nef). Moreover, we compute the nef cone of the blow-up of a nonsingular simple $G$-projective variety $X$ at a unique $B$-fixed point $x^-$, referred to as the sink of $X$. As an application, when $X$ is nonsingular, we calculate the Seshadri constants of any ample line bundle (not necessarily $G$-equivariant) at $x^-$. In addition, we compute the Seshadri constants of $B$-equivariant vector bundles at $x^{-}$.

Positivity on simple $G$-varieties

TL;DR

The paper addresses positivity for vector bundles on nonsingular simple -projective varieties by reducing ampleness and nefness to restrictions on -stable curves, and then computes precise Seshadri constants at the sink of such varieties. It establishes a nefness criterion for -equivariant bundles via curve restrictions, and analyzes the geometry of the blow-up at the sink to describe nef and Mori cones explicitly. Concrete formulas are derived: for any ample line bundle , The Seshadri constant at is , and for a -equivariant nef vector bundle , where splits on finitely many -stable curves through . These results yield a practical pathway to compute local positivity and Seshadri constants in the presence of group actions, with explicit instances for flag varieties and related simple -varieties.

Abstract

Let be a normal projective variety equipped with an action of a semisimple algebraic group , and assume that contains a unique closed orbit. Let be a Borel subgroup of and let be a -equivariant vector bundle on . In this article, we prove that is ample (respectively, nef) if and only if its restriction to the finite set of -stable curves in is ample (respectively, nef). Moreover, we compute the nef cone of the blow-up of a nonsingular simple -projective variety at a unique -fixed point , referred to as the sink of . As an application, when is nonsingular, we calculate the Seshadri constants of any ample line bundle (not necessarily -equivariant) at . In addition, we compute the Seshadri constants of -equivariant vector bundles at .
Paper Structure (4 sections, 10 theorems, 52 equations)

This paper contains 4 sections, 10 theorems, 52 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

Let $\Gamma$ be a connected solvable algebraic group, and $X$ be a complete $\Gamma$-variety. A $\Gamma$-equivariant vector bundle $E$ on $X$ is nef if and only if the restriction $E|_{C}$ of $E$ to every $\Gamma$-stable closed curve $C$ on $X$ is nef.

Theorems & Definitions (27)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Theorem 1.2
  • Definition 1.3: Seshadri constant at a point
  • Theorem 1.4
  • Theorem 1.5
  • Theorem 2.1: Theorem 1, fmss
  • proof : Proof of Theorem \ref{['theorem: nef']}
  • Proposition 2.2
  • proof
  • proof : Proof of Theorem \ref{['theorem: ample']}
  • ...and 17 more