An action language-based formalisation of an abstract argumentation framework

TL;DR

A new framework for modelling abstract argumentation graphs is proposed, a model that incorporates the order of enunciation of arguments, and a modification of the previous transformation based on a "last enunciated last updated"strategy is proposed, which verifies the second form of completeness.

Abstract

An abstract argumentation framework is a commonly used formalism to provide a static representation of a dialogue. However, the order of enunciation of the arguments in an argumentative dialogue is very important and can affect the outcome of this dialogue. In this paper, we propose a new framework for modelling abstract argumentation graphs, a model that incorporates the order of enunciation of arguments. By taking this order into account, we have the means to deduce a unique outcome for each dialogue, called an extension. We also establish several properties, such as termination and correctness, and discuss two notions of completeness. In particular, we propose a modification of the previous transformation based on a "last enunciated last updated" strategy, which verifies the second form of completeness.

Figures (1)

• Figure 1: Argumentation graph associated with Example \ref{['ex:IRM_ou_radio']}.