Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Social Media Bot Policies: Evaluating Passive and Active Enforcement

Kristina Radivojevic, Christopher McAleer, Catrell Conley, Cormac Kennedy, Paul Brenner

TL;DR

This paper studies the vulnerability of major social media platforms to multimodal foundation model powered bots by evaluating their bot and AI-generated content policies. It employs a Selenium driven web bot coupled with GPT-4o and DALL-E 3 across eight platforms, with manually created accounts and no API use, to simulate bot deployment and content posting. The key finding is that explicit policies do not translate into effective enforcement, as the bots managed to deploy and post AI generated content without consistent detection. The work highlights enforcement gaps, ethical considerations, and calls for stronger authentication, policy alignment, and a public testbed to enable ongoing evaluation of platform defenses against MFMs.

Abstract

The emergence of Multimodal Foundation Models (MFMs) holds significant promise for transforming social media platforms. However, this advancement also introduces substantial security and ethical concerns, as it may facilitate malicious actors in the exploitation of online users. We aim to evaluate the strength of security protocols on prominent social media platforms in mitigating the deployment of MFM bots. We examined the bot and content policies of eight popular social media platforms: X (formerly Twitter), Instagram, Facebook, Threads, TikTok, Mastodon, Reddit, and LinkedIn. Using Selenium, we developed a web bot to test bot deployment and AI-generated content policies and their enforcement mechanisms. Our findings indicate significant vulnerabilities within the current enforcement mechanisms of these platforms. Despite having explicit policies against bot activity, all platforms failed to detect and prevent the operation of our MFM bots. This finding reveals a critical gap in the security measures employed by these social media platforms, underscoring the potential for malicious actors to exploit these weaknesses to disseminate misinformation, commit fraud, or manipulate users.

Social Media Bot Policies: Evaluating Passive and Active Enforcement

TL;DR

This paper studies the vulnerability of major social media platforms to multimodal foundation model powered bots by evaluating their bot and AI-generated content policies. It employs a Selenium driven web bot coupled with GPT-4o and DALL-E 3 across eight platforms, with manually created accounts and no API use, to simulate bot deployment and content posting. The key finding is that explicit policies do not translate into effective enforcement, as the bots managed to deploy and post AI generated content without consistent detection. The work highlights enforcement gaps, ethical considerations, and calls for stronger authentication, policy alignment, and a public testbed to enable ongoing evaluation of platform defenses against MFMs.

Abstract

The emergence of Multimodal Foundation Models (MFMs) holds significant promise for transforming social media platforms. However, this advancement also introduces substantial security and ethical concerns, as it may facilitate malicious actors in the exploitation of online users. We aim to evaluate the strength of security protocols on prominent social media platforms in mitigating the deployment of MFM bots. We examined the bot and content policies of eight popular social media platforms: X (formerly Twitter), Instagram, Facebook, Threads, TikTok, Mastodon, Reddit, and LinkedIn. Using Selenium, we developed a web bot to test bot deployment and AI-generated content policies and their enforcement mechanisms. Our findings indicate significant vulnerabilities within the current enforcement mechanisms of these platforms. Despite having explicit policies against bot activity, all platforms failed to detect and prevent the operation of our MFM bots. This finding reveals a critical gap in the security measures employed by these social media platforms, underscoring the potential for malicious actors to exploit these weaknesses to disseminate misinformation, commit fraud, or manipulate users.
Paper Structure (12 sections, 2 figures)

This paper contains 12 sections, 2 figures.

Figures (2)

  • Figure 1: Potential Risks of Unregulated MFM-powered chatBots on Digital Platforms.
  • Figure 2: Social Media Bot Policy Enforcement Testing Framework Leveraging Selenium and MFM Automation.