Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Monge-Kantorovich Fitting With Sobolev Budgets

Forest Kobayashi, Jonathan Hayase, Young-Heon Kim

TL;DR

This work studies Monge–Kantorovich fitting where an $m$-dimensional measure is approximated by an $n$-dimensional measure under a Sobolev budget, formulating the problem as minimizing ${\mathscr J}_p(f)$ with ${\mathscr C}(f)\le\ell$ and connecting it to unequal-dimensional OT via closest-point projection. A gradient-like barycenter field is developed to capture the first variation of ${\mathscr J}_p$, enabling local improvements and proving an almost-strict monotonicity of the optimal value $J(\ell)$. Existence, regularity, and continuity properties are established, along with discretization schemes and consistency results. The paper also explores discretized toy simulations and outlines connections to generative learning, proposing a two-step factorization of WGANs in which Sobolev-regularized maps first approximate the target measure’s support, followed by reparametrizations that yield practical gains in training stability and interpolation. Collectively, these contributions provide a theoretically-grounded framework for Sobolev-budgeted low-dimensional fitting, with implications for manifold learning and regularized generative modeling.

Abstract

Given $m < n$, we consider the problem of ``best'' approximating an $n\text{-d}$ probability measure $ρ$ via an $m\text{-d}$ measure $ν$ such that $\mathrm{supp}\ ν$ has bounded total ``complexity.'' When $ρ$ is concentrated near an $m\text{-d}$ set we may interpret this as a manifold learning problem with noisy data. However, we do not restrict our analysis to this case, as the more general formulation has broader applications. We quantify $ν$'s performance in approximating $ρ$ via the Monge-Kantorovich (also called Wasserstein) $p$-cost $\mathbb{W}_p^p(ρ, ν)$, and constrain the complexity by requiring $\mathrm{supp}\ ν$ to be coverable by an $f : \mathbb{R}^{m} \to \mathbb{R}^{n}$ whose $W^{k,q}$ Sobolev norm is bounded by $\ell \geq 0$. This allows us to reformulate the problem as minimizing a functional $\mathscr J_p(f)$ under the Sobolev ``budget'' $\ell$. This problem is closely related to (but distinct from) principal curves with length constraints when $m=1, k = 1$ and an unsupervised analogue of smoothing splines when $k > 1$. New challenges arise from the higher-order differentiability condition. We study the ``gradient'' of $\mathscr J_p$, which is given by a certain vector field that we call the barycenter field, and use it to prove a nontrivial (almost) strict monotonicity result. We also provide a natural discretization scheme and establish its consistency. We use this scheme as a toy model for a generative learning task, and by analogy, propose novel interpretations for the role regularization plays in improving training.

Monge-Kantorovich Fitting With Sobolev Budgets

TL;DR

This work studies Monge–Kantorovich fitting where an -dimensional measure is approximated by an -dimensional measure under a Sobolev budget, formulating the problem as minimizing with and connecting it to unequal-dimensional OT via closest-point projection. A gradient-like barycenter field is developed to capture the first variation of , enabling local improvements and proving an almost-strict monotonicity of the optimal value . Existence, regularity, and continuity properties are established, along with discretization schemes and consistency results. The paper also explores discretized toy simulations and outlines connections to generative learning, proposing a two-step factorization of WGANs in which Sobolev-regularized maps first approximate the target measure’s support, followed by reparametrizations that yield practical gains in training stability and interpolation. Collectively, these contributions provide a theoretically-grounded framework for Sobolev-budgeted low-dimensional fitting, with implications for manifold learning and regularized generative modeling.

Abstract

Given , we consider the problem of ``best'' approximating an probability measure via an measure such that has bounded total ``complexity.'' When is concentrated near an set we may interpret this as a manifold learning problem with noisy data. However, we do not restrict our analysis to this case, as the more general formulation has broader applications. We quantify 's performance in approximating via the Monge-Kantorovich (also called Wasserstein) -cost , and constrain the complexity by requiring to be coverable by an whose Sobolev norm is bounded by . This allows us to reformulate the problem as minimizing a functional under the Sobolev ``budget'' . This problem is closely related to (but distinct from) principal curves with length constraints when and an unsupervised analogue of smoothing splines when . New challenges arise from the higher-order differentiability condition. We study the ``gradient'' of , which is given by a certain vector field that we call the barycenter field, and use it to prove a nontrivial (almost) strict monotonicity result. We also provide a natural discretization scheme and establish its consistency. We use this scheme as a toy model for a generative learning task, and by analogy, propose novel interpretations for the role regularization plays in improving training.
Paper Structure (59 sections, 27 theorems, 144 equations, 39 figures)

This paper contains 59 sections, 27 theorems, 144 equations, 39 figures.

Key Result

Lemma 1.2

For each $\lambda$ let $f_\lambda$ be an optimizer of ${\mathscr{J}}_{ p}^\lambda$ of prob:soft-penalty. Then,

Figures (39)

  • Figure 1: Closest points for $N=250$ uniformly-sampled $\omega \in \Omega$.
  • Figure 2: Closest point projections for $N=250$ points sampled according to $\rho = {\mathcal{N}}({\mathbf{0}}; [\sigma_X^2\ 0;\ 0 \sigma_Y^2])$ (truncated to $\Omega$), where $\sigma_X^2 = 1$, $\sigma_Y^2=9/121$.
  • Figure 3: Adding two kinds of spikes.
  • Figure 4: Example for $\Omega = B_1(0; \mathbb{R}^2)$ and $(\pm 1,0) \in \mathop{\mathrm{supp}}\nolimits( \rho)$.
  • Figure 5: Example $f_0$, $f_{.5}$ and $f_1$ for which $Y_0 \not\equiv Y_1$.
  • ...and 34 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (59)

  • Remark 1.1
  • Lemma 1.2
  • proof
  • Definition 2.1
  • Remark 2.2
  • Lemma 2.3
  • Proposition 2.4: General Sobolev Inequality
  • Corollary 2.5
  • Definition 2.6: Objective Function
  • Proposition 2.7
  • ...and 49 more