Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Age of Gossip in Networks with Multiple Views of a Source

Kian J. Khojastepour, Matin Mortaheb, Sennur Ulukus

TL;DR

This work analyzes the version age of information in networks with multiple sensing nodes that view a shared continuous-valued source. Using stochastic-hybrid-system methods, it derives a general recursive expression for the average version AoI $v_S$ of any node subset $S$, enabling topology-specific analyses for ring, line, and fully connected networks. The ring and line results show that distributed sensing can achieve the same or improved asymptotic AoI scaling as single-view models, with $v_1 = O(\sqrt{n})$ for rings under typical rate scalings and $v_1 = O(\log n)$ (or other sublinear forms) for fully connected networks depending on PPP rate scaling. The paper also discusses a fair metric NoVAI (normalised average AoI) and demonstrates that distributed sampling can match single-view performance, offering practical guidance for designing multi-view sensing in large-scale networks.

Abstract

We consider the version age of information (AoI) in a network where a subset of nodes act as sensing nodes, sampling a source that in general can follow a continuous distribution. Any sample of the source constitutes a new version of the information and the version age of the information is defined with respect to the most recent version of the information available for the whole network. We derive a recursive expression for the average version AoI between different subsets of the nodes which can be used to evaluate the average version AoI for any subset of the nodes including any single node. We derive asymptotic behavior of the average AoI on any single node of the network for various topologies including line, ring, and fully connected networks. The prior art result on version age of a network by Yates [ISIT'21] can be interpreted as in our derivation as a network with a single view of the source, e.g., through a Poisson process with rate $λ_{00}$. Our result indicates that there is no loss in the average version AoI performance by replacing a single view of the source with distributed sensing across multiple nodes by splitting the same rate $λ_{00}$. Particularly, we show that asymptotically, the average AoI scales with $O(\log(n))$ and $O(\sqrt{n})$ for fully connected and ring networks, respectively. More interestingly, we show that for the ring network the same $O(\sqrt{n})$ asymptotical performance on average AoI is still achieved with distributed sensing if the number of sensing nodes only scales with $O(\sqrt{n})$ instead of prior known result which requires $O(n)$. Our results indicate that the sensing nodes can be arbitrarily chosen as long as the maximum number of consecutive non-sensing nodes also scales as $O(\sqrt{n})$.

Age of Gossip in Networks with Multiple Views of a Source

TL;DR

This work analyzes the version age of information in networks with multiple sensing nodes that view a shared continuous-valued source. Using stochastic-hybrid-system methods, it derives a general recursive expression for the average version AoI of any node subset , enabling topology-specific analyses for ring, line, and fully connected networks. The ring and line results show that distributed sensing can achieve the same or improved asymptotic AoI scaling as single-view models, with for rings under typical rate scalings and (or other sublinear forms) for fully connected networks depending on PPP rate scaling. The paper also discusses a fair metric NoVAI (normalised average AoI) and demonstrates that distributed sampling can match single-view performance, offering practical guidance for designing multi-view sensing in large-scale networks.

Abstract

We consider the version age of information (AoI) in a network where a subset of nodes act as sensing nodes, sampling a source that in general can follow a continuous distribution. Any sample of the source constitutes a new version of the information and the version age of the information is defined with respect to the most recent version of the information available for the whole network. We derive a recursive expression for the average version AoI between different subsets of the nodes which can be used to evaluate the average version AoI for any subset of the nodes including any single node. We derive asymptotic behavior of the average AoI on any single node of the network for various topologies including line, ring, and fully connected networks. The prior art result on version age of a network by Yates [ISIT'21] can be interpreted as in our derivation as a network with a single view of the source, e.g., through a Poisson process with rate . Our result indicates that there is no loss in the average version AoI performance by replacing a single view of the source with distributed sensing across multiple nodes by splitting the same rate . Particularly, we show that asymptotically, the average AoI scales with and for fully connected and ring networks, respectively. More interestingly, we show that for the ring network the same asymptotical performance on average AoI is still achieved with distributed sensing if the number of sensing nodes only scales with instead of prior known result which requires . Our results indicate that the sensing nodes can be arbitrarily chosen as long as the maximum number of consecutive non-sensing nodes also scales as .
Paper Structure (8 sections, 2 theorems, 19 equations, 5 figures)

This paper contains 8 sections, 2 theorems, 19 equations, 5 figures.

Key Result

Proposition 1

The average version AoI for a subset $S$ in a network with sensing nodes $i \in I$ that sample a view of the source at times characterized by PPP$(\lambda_{ii})$, and update received at node $j$ from node $i$ at the times given by PPP$(\lambda_{ij})$, $i \neq j$ is given by

Figures (5)

  • Figure 1: (a) An example single source (single sensing node) network, and (b) an example multiple sensing node network.
  • Figure 2: An example multi-view network with multiple sensing nodes. Nodes 0 and 1 are sensing nodes.
  • Figure 3: (a) Ring network, and (b) fully connected network, where all nodes are sensing nodes.
  • Figure 4: Effect of changing $q$ in average AoI in line/ring network.
  • Figure 5: Effect of changing $d$ in average AoI in line/ring network.

Theorems & Definitions (3)

  • Proposition 1
  • Example 1
  • Proposition 2