LPT++: Efficient Training on Mixture of Long-tailed Experts
Bowen Dong, Pan Zhou, Wangmeng Zuo
TL;DR
LPT++ addresses long-tailed image classification by combining parameter-efficient fine-tuning with a model-ensemble strategy. It introduces a universal long-tailed adaptation module, a mixture of long-tailed experts (MoLEs) with a lightweight MoE scorer, and a three-phase training regime to separately optimize prompts, adapters, and the MoE scorer. The simpler LPT variant isolates the impact of long-tailed prompts on visual-only pretrained ViTs. Empirically, LPT++ achieves state-of-the-art or near-state-of-the-art results on Places-LT and iNaturalist 2018, with robust performance under domain shift and minimal additional trainable parameters (~1%), highlighting its practicality for deployment.
Abstract
We introduce LPT++, a comprehensive framework for long-tailed classification that combines parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) with a learnable model ensemble. LPT++ enhances frozen Vision Transformers (ViTs) through the integration of three core components. The first is a universal long-tailed adaptation module, which aggregates long-tailed prompts and visual adapters to adapt the pretrained model to the target domain, meanwhile improving its discriminative ability. The second is the mixture of long-tailed experts framework with a mixture-of-experts (MoE) scorer, which adaptively calculates reweighting coefficients for confidence scores from both visual-only and visual-language (VL) model experts to generate more accurate predictions. Finally, LPT++ employs a three-phase training framework, wherein each critical module is learned separately, resulting in a stable and effective long-tailed classification training paradigm. Besides, we also propose the simple version of LPT++ namely LPT, which only integrates visual-only pretrained ViT and long-tailed prompts to formulate a single model method. LPT can clearly illustrate how long-tailed prompts works meanwhile achieving comparable performance without VL pretrained models. Experiments show that, with only ~1% extra trainable parameters, LPT++ achieves comparable accuracy against all the counterparts.
