Table of Contents
Fetching ...

A Model-Free Optimal Control Method With Fixed Terminal States and Delay

Mi Zhou, Erik Verriest, Chaouki Abdallah

TL;DR

A new model-free algorithm is proposed based on basis functions, gradient estimation, and the Lagrange method for optimality conditions-based control of state-dependent switched systems and time-delay systems.

Abstract

Model-free algorithms are brought into the control system's research with the emergence of reinforcement learning algorithms. However, there are two practical challenges of reinforcement learning-based methods. First, learning by interacting with the environment is highly complex. Second, constraints on the states (boundary conditions) require additional care since the state trajectory is implicitly defined from the inputs and system dynamics. To address these problems, this paper proposes a new model-free algorithm based on basis functions, gradient estimation, and the Lagrange method. The favorable performance of the proposed algorithm is shown using several examples under state-dependent switches and time delays.

A Model-Free Optimal Control Method With Fixed Terminal States and Delay

TL;DR

A new model-free algorithm is proposed based on basis functions, gradient estimation, and the Lagrange method for optimality conditions-based control of state-dependent switched systems and time-delay systems.

Abstract

Model-free algorithms are brought into the control system's research with the emergence of reinforcement learning algorithms. However, there are two practical challenges of reinforcement learning-based methods. First, learning by interacting with the environment is highly complex. Second, constraints on the states (boundary conditions) require additional care since the state trajectory is implicitly defined from the inputs and system dynamics. To address these problems, this paper proposes a new model-free algorithm based on basis functions, gradient estimation, and the Lagrange method. The favorable performance of the proposed algorithm is shown using several examples under state-dependent switches and time delays.
Paper Structure (13 sections, 3 theorems, 23 equations, 8 figures, 3 tables)

This paper contains 13 sections, 3 theorems, 23 equations, 8 figures, 3 tables.

Key Result

Lemma 1

Assume The iterates $(\theta_n, \mu_n)$ converge to a fixed point could be a local one almost surely, which is a feasible solution.

Figures (8)

  • Figure 1: Framework of the proposed algorithm.
  • Figure 2: MATLAB GUI for the solver.
  • Figure 3: Example 1: (a) state $x(t)$ under different basis functions (magenta: Chebyshev; green: Legendre; blue: Fourier); (b) control input $u(t)$ under different basis functions (magenta: Chebyshev; green: Legendre; blue: Fourier); (c) cost $J$ with respect to number of basis functions used.
  • Figure 4: Example 1: Heatmap of the parameters after convergence using different basis: (a)Chebyshev ($m=4$, $\alpha=0.01$) (b) Legendre ($m=6$, $\alpha=0.01$) (c) Fourier ($m=4$, $\alpha=0.01$).
  • Figure 5: Example 2: (a) state $x_1(t)$ under different basis functions (magenta: Chebyshev; green: Legendre; blue: Fourier); (b) state $x_2(t)$; (c) control input $u(t)$ under different basis functions (magenta: Chebyshev; green: Legendre; blue: Fourier); (d) cost $J$ with respect to number of basis functions used.
  • ...and 3 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (5)

  • Lemma 1
  • Definition 1: Epi-convergence
  • Lemma 2
  • Theorem 1
  • proof