Table of Contents
Fetching ...

New Direct Sum Tests

Alek Westover, Edward Yu, Kai Zheng

Abstract

A function $f:[n]^{d} \to \mathbb{F}_2$ is a \defn{direct sum} if there are functions $L_i:[n]\to \mathbb{F}_2$ such that ${f(x) = \sum_{i}L_i(x_i)}$. In this work we give multiple results related to the property testing of direct sums. Our first result concerns a test proposed by Dinur and Golubev in 2019. We call their test the Diamond test and show that it is indeed a direct sum tester. More specifically, we show that if a function $f$ is $ε$-far from being a direct sum function, then the Diamond test rejects $f$ with probability at least $Ω_{n,ε}(1)$. Even in the case of $n = 2$, the Diamond test is, to the best of our knowledge, novel and yields a new tester for the classic property of affinity. Apart from the Diamond test, we also analyze a broad family of direct sum tests, which at a high level, run an arbitrary affinity test on the restriction of $f$ to a random hypercube inside of $[n]^d$. This family of tests includes the direct sum test analyzed in \cite{di19}, but does not include the Diamond test. As an application of our result, we obtain a direct sum test which works in the online adversary model of \cite{KRV}. Finally, we also discuss a Fourier analytic interpretation of the diamond tester in the $n=2$ case, as well as prove local correction results for direct sum as conjectured by Dinur and Golubev.

New Direct Sum Tests

Abstract

A function is a \defn{direct sum} if there are functions such that . In this work we give multiple results related to the property testing of direct sums. Our first result concerns a test proposed by Dinur and Golubev in 2019. We call their test the Diamond test and show that it is indeed a direct sum tester. More specifically, we show that if a function is -far from being a direct sum function, then the Diamond test rejects with probability at least . Even in the case of , the Diamond test is, to the best of our knowledge, novel and yields a new tester for the classic property of affinity. Apart from the Diamond test, we also analyze a broad family of direct sum tests, which at a high level, run an arbitrary affinity test on the restriction of to a random hypercube inside of . This family of tests includes the direct sum test analyzed in \cite{di19}, but does not include the Diamond test. As an application of our result, we obtain a direct sum test which works in the online adversary model of \cite{KRV}. Finally, we also discuss a Fourier analytic interpretation of the diamond tester in the case, as well as prove local correction results for direct sum as conjectured by Dinur and Golubev.
Paper Structure (19 sections, 32 theorems, 115 equations)

This paper contains 19 sections, 32 theorems, 115 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.4

Suppose $f: [n]^d \to \mathbb{F}_2$ passes the Diamond test with probability $1-\varepsilon$. Then, $f$ is $C_n\cdot \varepsilon$-close to a direct sum, for some constant $C_n$ independent of $d$.

Theorems & Definitions (62)

  • Theorem 1.4
  • Theorem 1.5
  • Theorem 1.6
  • Proposition 1.7
  • Lemma 3.2
  • proof
  • Corollary 3.3
  • proof
  • Theorem 3.4
  • Lemma 3.6
  • ...and 52 more