Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Efficient Learning of Balanced Signed Graphs via Iterative Linear Programming

Haruki Yokota, Hiroshi Higashi, Yuichi Tanaka, Gene Cheung

TL;DR

Experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets show that the balanced graph learning method outperforms competing methods and enables the use of spectral filters and graph neural networks designed for positive graphs on balanced signed graphs.

Abstract

Signed graphs are equipped with both positive and negative edge weights, encoding pairwise correlations as well as anti-correlations in data. A balanced signed graph has no cycles of odd number of negative edges. Laplacian of a balanced signed graph has eigenvectors that map simply to ones in a similarity-transformed positive graph Laplacian, thus enabling reuse of well-studied spectral filters designed for positive graphs. We propose a fast method to learn a balanced signed graph Laplacian directly from data. Specifically, for each node $i$, to determine its polarity $β_i \in \{-1,1\}$ and edge weights $\{w_{i,j}\}_{j=1}^N$, we extend a sparse inverse covariance formulation based on linear programming (LP) called CLIME, by adding linear constraints to enforce ``consistent" signs of edge weights $\{w_{i,j}\}_{j=1}^N$ with the polarities of connected nodes -- i.e., positive/negative edges connect nodes of same/opposing polarities. For each LP, we adapt projections on convex set (POCS) to determine a suitable CLIME parameter $ρ> 0$ that guarantees LP feasibility. We solve the resulting LP via an off-the-shelf LP solver in $\mathcal{O}(N^{2.055})$. Experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets show that our balanced graph learning method outperforms competing methods and enables the use of spectral filters and graph convolutional networks (GCNs) designed for positive graphs on signed graphs.

Efficient Learning of Balanced Signed Graphs via Iterative Linear Programming

TL;DR

Experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets show that the balanced graph learning method outperforms competing methods and enables the use of spectral filters and graph neural networks designed for positive graphs on balanced signed graphs.

Abstract

Signed graphs are equipped with both positive and negative edge weights, encoding pairwise correlations as well as anti-correlations in data. A balanced signed graph has no cycles of odd number of negative edges. Laplacian of a balanced signed graph has eigenvectors that map simply to ones in a similarity-transformed positive graph Laplacian, thus enabling reuse of well-studied spectral filters designed for positive graphs. We propose a fast method to learn a balanced signed graph Laplacian directly from data. Specifically, for each node , to determine its polarity and edge weights , we extend a sparse inverse covariance formulation based on linear programming (LP) called CLIME, by adding linear constraints to enforce ``consistent" signs of edge weights with the polarities of connected nodes -- i.e., positive/negative edges connect nodes of same/opposing polarities. For each LP, we adapt projections on convex set (POCS) to determine a suitable CLIME parameter that guarantees LP feasibility. We solve the resulting LP via an off-the-shelf LP solver in . Experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets show that our balanced graph learning method outperforms competing methods and enables the use of spectral filters and graph convolutional networks (GCNs) designed for positive graphs on signed graphs.
Paper Structure (12 sections, 1 theorem, 10 equations, 1 figure, 2 tables)

This paper contains 12 sections, 1 theorem, 10 equations, 1 figure, 2 tables.

Key Result

Theorem 1

A given signed graph is balanced if and only if its nodes can be polarized into $1$ and $-1$, such that a positive edge always connects nodes of the same polarity, and a negative edge always connects nodes of opposing polarities.

Figures (1)

  • Figure 1: Balanced signed graph $\mathcal{G}^b$ (left) and its similarity-transformed positive graph $\mathcal{G}^+$ (right). Numbers inside node denote node indices, and numbers beside edges denote edge weights. Blue-/red-colored nodes have positive/negative polarities, respectively.

Theorems & Definitions (2)

  • Theorem 1
  • Definition 2