Table of Contents
Fetching ...

On the oriented diameter of graphs with given minimum degree

Garner Cochran, Zhiyu Wang

TL;DR

The paper addresses bounding the oriented diameter of bridgeless graphs in terms of order $n$ and minimum degree $\delta$. It introduces a Main Lemma that iteratively builds bridgeless oriented subgraphs $H_i$ and vertex sets $S_i$ with diameter bounded by $(3+\epsilon)|S_i|$ and a neighborhood-expansion property, while ensuring all vertices are within distance $L(\epsilon)$ of the final $H_m$. This framework, combined with an extension lemma, yields an overall bound $\overrightarrow{\text{diam}}(G)\le (3+\epsilon)\frac{n}{\delta-2}+O(1)$ for all $\delta\ge 3$, and asymptotically tightness is discussed via constructions approaching the lower bound $\frac{3n}{\delta+1}+O(1)$. The results asymptotically resolve the question posed by Bau and Dankelmann on the smallest possible constant $c$ in $\overrightarrow{\text{diam}}(G)\le c\cdot\frac{3n}{\delta+1}+O(1)$. The work also notes potential improvements to the denominator and connections to algorithmic orientation construction.

Abstract

Erdős, Pach, Pollack, and Tuza [\textit{J. Combin. Theory Ser. B, 47(1) (1989), 73-79}] proved that the diameter of a connected $n$-vertex graph with minimum degree $δ$ is at most $\frac{3n}{δ+1}+O(1)$. The oriented diameter of an undirected graph $G$, denoted by $\overrightarrow{\text{diam}}(G)$, is the minimum diameter of a strongly connected orientation of $G$. Bau and Dankelmann [\textit{European J. Combin., 49 (2015), 126-133}] showed that for every bridgeless $n$-vertex graph $G$ with minimum degree $δ$, $\overrightarrow{\text{diam}}(G) \leq \frac{11n}{δ+1}+9$. They also showed an infinite family of graphs with oriented diameter at least $\frac{3n}{δ+1} + O(1)$ and posed the problem of determining the smallest possible value $c$ for which $\overrightarrow{\text{diam}}(G) \leq c \cdot\frac{3n}{δ+1}+O(1)$ holds. In this paper, we show that the smallest value $c$ such that the upper bound above holds for all $δ\geq 2$ is $1$, which is best possible.

On the oriented diameter of graphs with given minimum degree

TL;DR

The paper addresses bounding the oriented diameter of bridgeless graphs in terms of order and minimum degree . It introduces a Main Lemma that iteratively builds bridgeless oriented subgraphs and vertex sets with diameter bounded by and a neighborhood-expansion property, while ensuring all vertices are within distance of the final . This framework, combined with an extension lemma, yields an overall bound for all , and asymptotically tightness is discussed via constructions approaching the lower bound . The results asymptotically resolve the question posed by Bau and Dankelmann on the smallest possible constant in . The work also notes potential improvements to the denominator and connections to algorithmic orientation construction.

Abstract

Erdős, Pach, Pollack, and Tuza [\textit{J. Combin. Theory Ser. B, 47(1) (1989), 73-79}] proved that the diameter of a connected -vertex graph with minimum degree is at most . The oriented diameter of an undirected graph , denoted by , is the minimum diameter of a strongly connected orientation of . Bau and Dankelmann [\textit{European J. Combin., 49 (2015), 126-133}] showed that for every bridgeless -vertex graph with minimum degree , . They also showed an infinite family of graphs with oriented diameter at least and posed the problem of determining the smallest possible value for which holds. In this paper, we show that the smallest value such that the upper bound above holds for all is , which is best possible.
Paper Structure (3 sections, 4 theorems, 21 equations, 5 figures)

This paper contains 3 sections, 4 theorems, 21 equations, 5 figures.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

Bau-Dankelmann2015 Given a bridgeless graph $G$ of order $n$ and minimum degree $\delta \geq 2$, $\overrightarrow{\text{diam}}(G)\leq \frac{11n}{\delta+1}+9$. Moreover, given $\delta\geq 4$ and sufficiently large $n$, there exists a bridgeless $n$-vertex graph $G$ with minimum degree $\delta$ such t

Figures (5)

  • Figure 1: The main paths $P$ and $Q$.
  • Figure 2: Independent paths between $a_1, a_2$ and $b_1$, and between $b_1, b_2$ and $a_1$.
  • Figure 3: Illustrations for Case $2$--$4$ (from left to right).
  • Figure 5: Cases when $x'\in B_i"$.
  • Figure 6: Cases when $x'\in B_i'\backslash A_i'$.

Theorems & Definitions (17)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Theorem 1.2
  • Conjecture 1
  • Lemma 2.1
  • proof : Proof of Lemma \ref{['lem:main-lemma']}
  • Claim 1
  • proof
  • Claim 2
  • proof
  • Claim 3
  • ...and 7 more