Piercing intersecting convex sets
Imre Bárány, Travis Dillon, Dömötör Pálvölgyi, Dániel Varga
TL;DR
This work addresses a Helly-type transversal problem for two finite convex families $\mathcal{A}$ and $\mathcal{B}$ in $\mathbb{R}^3$ with $A\cap B\neq\emptyset$ for all pairs; it proves a line transversal result in the special case where $\mathcal{A}$ and $\mathcal{B}$ consist of vertical polygons lying in parallel planes, guaranteeing a line that intersects all sets of one family. It then strengthens the result by showing a location-restricted fractional transversal: under the same setup, there is a line lying in the plane of some $A_i$ hitting $\frac{1}{6}|\mathcal{B}|$ sets in $\mathcal{B}$ (or symmetrically in a $B_j$-plane hitting $\frac{1}{6}|\mathcal{A}|$). The main technique combines affine normalization, a bilinear feasibility framework via Farkas' lemma, dualizing to a non-constructive existence proof, and a secondary fractional Helly argument to obtain a plane-restricted transversal; a higher-dimensional partial extension is outlined. These results advance understanding of Helly-type line transversals for intersecting convex families and provide a framework for constructive computation in fixed dimension.
Abstract
Assume two finite families $\mathcal A$ and $\mathcal B$ of convex sets in $\mathbb{R}^3$ have the property that $A\cap B\ne \emptyset$ for every $A \in \mathcal A$ and $B\in \mathcal B$. Is there a constant $γ>0$ (independent of $\mathcal A$ and $\mathcal B$) such that there is a line intersecting $γ|\mathcal A|$ sets in $\mathcal A$ or $γ|\mathcal B|$ sets in $\mathcal B$? This is an intriguing Helly-type question from a paper by Martínez, Roldan and Rubin. We confirm this in the special case when all sets in $\mathcal A$ lie in parallel planes and all sets in $\mathcal B$ lie in parallel planes; in fact, all sets from one of the two families has a line transversal.
