Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Bounding finite-image sequences of length $ω^k$

Harry Altman

Abstract

Given a well-quasi-order $X$ and an ordinal $α$, the set $s^F_α(X)$ of transfinite sequences on $X$ with length less than $α$ and with finite image is also a well-quasi-order, as proven by Nash-Williams. Before Nash-Williams proved it for general $α$, however, it was proven for $α<ω^ω$ by Erdős and Rado. In this paper, we revisit Erdős and Rado's proof and improve upon it, using it to obtain upper bounds on the maximum linearization of $s^F_{ω^k}(X)$ in terms of $k$ and $o(X)$, where $o(X)$ denotes the maximum linearization of $X$. We show that, for fixed $k$, $o(s^F_{ω^k}(X))$ is bounded above by a function which can roughly be described as $(k+1)$-times exponential in $o(X)$. We also show that, for $k\le 2$, this bound is not far from tight.

Bounding finite-image sequences of length $ω^k$

Abstract

Given a well-quasi-order and an ordinal , the set of transfinite sequences on with length less than and with finite image is also a well-quasi-order, as proven by Nash-Williams. Before Nash-Williams proved it for general , however, it was proven for by Erdős and Rado. In this paper, we revisit Erdős and Rado's proof and improve upon it, using it to obtain upper bounds on the maximum linearization of in terms of and , where denotes the maximum linearization of . We show that, for fixed , is bounded above by a function which can roughly be described as -times exponential in . We also show that, for , this bound is not far from tight.
Paper Structure (5 sections, 21 theorems, 42 equations)

This paper contains 5 sections, 21 theorems, 42 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

For any fixed $k$ which is finite and nonzero, the type of $s^F_{\omega^k}(X)$ is bounded above by a function which is $(k+1)$-times exponential in $o(X)$ (in an appropriate sense to be made clear below). (See Theorem upper for a precise version of this theorem.)

Theorems & Definitions (56)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Theorem 1.2
  • Definition 2.1
  • Definition 2.2
  • Theorem 2.3: De Jongh, Parikh, Schmidt DJPSchmidt
  • Definition 2.4
  • Theorem 2.6: Abriola et. al. Abriola
  • Definition 2.7
  • Definition 3.1
  • Definition 3.2
  • ...and 46 more