Table of Contents
Fetching ...

On the straightening of every functor

Thomas Blom

TL;DR

This work proves that every functor between ∞-categories can be straightened: for any ∞-category $\mathcal{C}$ there is a natural equivalence $(\mathrm{Cat}_{\infty})_{/\mathcal{C}} \simeq \mathrm{Lax}_{\mathrm{un}}(\mathcal{C}^{\mathrm{h}}, \mathbb{C}\mathrm{orr})$, where $\mathbb{C}\mathrm{orr}$ is a double ∞-category of correspondences and lax functors are unital. The proof builds a universal Morita double category, showing that $\mathrm{Lax}(\mathbb{E}, \mathbb{D}) \simeq \mathrm{Lax}_{\mathrm{un}}(\mathbb{E}, \mathrm{Mor}(\mathbb{D}))$ for Moritable double categories $\mathbb{D}$, and then applies this to the span double category to obtain the main straightening result. By identifying $\mathbb{C}\mathrm{orr}$ with various other notions of correspondences (Ayala–Francis, Ruit, Heine) the paper unifies several strands of straightening results, including Conduché fibrations and locally cocartesian fibrations, within a single double‑categorical framework. The approach yields a clean, intrinsic equivalence that clarifies the role of correspondences in straightening and opens avenues for higher-categorical enhancements and extensions to $(\infty,n)$-categories. Overall, the work provides a robust, conceptual bridge between overcategories of ∞-categories and lax functors into a universal correspondence double category, with broad implications for higher Morita theory and fibration straightening.

Abstract

We show that any functor between $\infty$-categories can be straightened. More precisely, we show that for any $\infty$-category $\mathcal{C}$, there is an equivalence between the $\infty$-category $(\mathrm{Cat}_{\infty})_{/\mathcal{C}}$ of $\infty$-categories over $\mathcal{C}$ and the $\infty$-category of unital lax functors from $\mathcal{C}$ to the double $\infty$-category $\mathrm{Corr}$ of correspondences. The proof relies on a certain universal property of the Morita category which is of independent interest.

On the straightening of every functor

TL;DR

This work proves that every functor between ∞-categories can be straightened: for any ∞-category there is a natural equivalence , where is a double ∞-category of correspondences and lax functors are unital. The proof builds a universal Morita double category, showing that for Moritable double categories , and then applies this to the span double category to obtain the main straightening result. By identifying with various other notions of correspondences (Ayala–Francis, Ruit, Heine) the paper unifies several strands of straightening results, including Conduché fibrations and locally cocartesian fibrations, within a single double‑categorical framework. The approach yields a clean, intrinsic equivalence that clarifies the role of correspondences in straightening and opens avenues for higher-categorical enhancements and extensions to -categories. Overall, the work provides a robust, conceptual bridge between overcategories of ∞-categories and lax functors into a universal correspondence double category, with broad implications for higher Morita theory and fibration straightening.

Abstract

We show that any functor between -categories can be straightened. More precisely, we show that for any -category , there is an equivalence between the -category of -categories over and the -category of unital lax functors from to the double -category of correspondences. The proof relies on a certain universal property of the Morita category which is of independent interest.
Paper Structure (25 sections, 28 theorems, 91 equations)

This paper contains 25 sections, 28 theorems, 91 equations.

Key Result

Theorem A

There exists a double $\infty$-category $\mathbb{C}\mathrm{orr}$ such that for any $\infty$-category $\mathcal{C}$, there is an equivalence between the $\infty$-category $(\mathcal{C}\mathrm{at}_\infty)_{/\mathcal{C}}$ of $\infty$-categories over $\mathcal{C}$ and the $\infty$-category $\mathrm{Lax}

Theorems & Definitions (92)

  • Theorem A
  • Remark 1.1
  • Theorem B
  • Remark 1.2
  • Definition 2.1: Segal objects
  • Example 2.2: Complete Segal spaces
  • Definition 2.3: Double categories
  • Remark 2.4
  • Example 2.5: Monoidal categories
  • Example 2.6: 2-categories
  • ...and 82 more