Perceive-IR: Learning to Perceive Degradation Better for All-in-One Image Restoration
Xu Zhang, Jiaqi Ma, Guoli Wang, Qian Zhang, Huan Zhang, Lefei Zhang
TL;DR
Perceive-IR tackles the challenge of fine-grained degradation perception in All-in-One image restoration by introducing a backbone-agnostic two-stage framework. The first stage builds a quality perceiver via a multi-level prompt learning process in CLIP space, while the second stage integrates this perceiver with a quality-aware restoration loss, augmented by a Semantic Guidance Module and Compact Feature Extraction. The approach achieves state-of-the-art results across All-in-One and generalization scenarios, and demonstrates robust transferability to different restoration backbones and real-world degradations. Overall, it provides a flexible, effective pathway for integrating quality-aware perception into diverse restoration networks, advancing practical All-in-One restoration.
Abstract
Existing All-in-One image restoration methods often fail to perceive degradation types and severity levels simultaneously, overlooking the importance of fine-grained quality perception. Moreover, these methods often utilize highly customized backbones, which hinder their adaptability and integration into more advanced restoration networks. To address these limitations, we propose Perceive-IR, a novel backbone-agnostic All-in-One image restoration framework designed for fine-grained quality control across various degradation types and severity levels. Its modular structure allows core components to function independently of specific backbones, enabling seamless integration into advanced restoration models without significant modifications. Specifically, Perceive-IR operates in two key stages: 1) multi-level quality-driven prompt learning stage, where a fine-grained quality perceiver is meticulously trained to discern three tier quality levels by optimizing the alignment between prompts and images within the CLIP perception space. This stage ensures a nuanced understanding of image quality, laying the groundwork for subsequent restoration; 2) restoration stage, where the quality perceiver is seamlessly integrated with a difficulty-adaptive perceptual loss, forming a quality-aware learning strategy. This strategy not only dynamically differentiates sample learning difficulty but also achieves fine-grained quality control by driving the restored image toward the ground truth while pulling it away from both low- and medium-quality samples.
