Table of Contents
Fetching ...

On characterization of Monogenic number fields associated with certain quadrinomials and its applications

Tapas Chatterjee, Karishan Kumar

TL;DR

The paper addresses identifying when the number field $K=\mathbb{Q}(\theta)$, with $\theta$ a root of $f(x)=x^{n}+a x^{3}+b x+c$, is monogenic. Under the constraints $n=3k>4$, $\frac{a}{a-c}=k$ and $2ab=3ac-bc$, the authors apply Dedekind's criterion to classify primes $p$ dividing the discriminant $D_{f}$ that do not divide the index $[\mathcal{O}_{K}:\mathbb{Z}[\theta]]$, yielding explicit necessary and sufficient conditions for monogenicity that depend only on $a,b,c,n$. A central contribution is the formulation of conditions (1)–(6) that characterize when $p \nmid [\mathcal{O}_{K}:\mathbb{Z}[\theta]]$, enabling a complete, prime-wise monogenicity test and leading to a corollary that $\mathcal{O}_{K}=\mathbb{Z}[\theta]$ under these conditions. The work also reveals a connection to differential equations through an auxiliary polynomial framework and demonstrates practical validity via illustrative examples. Overall, the results provide concrete, implementable criteria to identify monogenic quadrinomial-associated number fields and illuminate the interplay between discriminants, indices, and the ring of integers.

Abstract

Let $f(x)=x^{n}+ax^{3}+bx+c$ be the minimal polynomial of an algebraic integer $θ$ over the rationals with certain conditions on $a,~b,~c,$ and $n.$ Let $K=\mathbb{Q}(θ)$ be a number field and $\mathcal{O}_{K}$ be the ring of integers of $K.$ In this article, we characterize all the prime divisors of the discriminant of $f(x)$ which do not divide the index of $θ.$ As an interesting result, we establish necessary and sufficient conditions for the field $K=\mathbb{Q}(θ)$ to be monogenic. Finally, we investigate the types of solutions to certain differential equations associated with the polynomial $f(x).$

On characterization of Monogenic number fields associated with certain quadrinomials and its applications

TL;DR

The paper addresses identifying when the number field , with a root of , is monogenic. Under the constraints , and , the authors apply Dedekind's criterion to classify primes dividing the discriminant that do not divide the index , yielding explicit necessary and sufficient conditions for monogenicity that depend only on . A central contribution is the formulation of conditions (1)–(6) that characterize when , enabling a complete, prime-wise monogenicity test and leading to a corollary that under these conditions. The work also reveals a connection to differential equations through an auxiliary polynomial framework and demonstrates practical validity via illustrative examples. Overall, the results provide concrete, implementable criteria to identify monogenic quadrinomial-associated number fields and illuminate the interplay between discriminants, indices, and the ring of integers.

Abstract

Let be the minimal polynomial of an algebraic integer over the rationals with certain conditions on and Let be a number field and be the ring of integers of In this article, we characterize all the prime divisors of the discriminant of which do not divide the index of As an interesting result, we establish necessary and sufficient conditions for the field to be monogenic. Finally, we investigate the types of solutions to certain differential equations associated with the polynomial
Paper Structure (5 sections, 8 theorems, 108 equations)

This paper contains 5 sections, 8 theorems, 108 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

Let $K=\mathbb{Q}(\theta)$ be a number field and $\theta$ be an algebraic integer with the minimal polynomial over the field $\mathbb{Q},$ where $\frac{a}{a-c}=k\in{\mathbb N}$ such that $n=3k>4,$ and $2ab=3ac-bc.$ Let $\mathcal{O}_{K}$ be the ring of algebraic integers of $K.$ A prime factor $p$ of the discriminant $D_{f}$ of $f(x)$ does not divide $[\mathcal{O}_{K}:\mathbb{Z}[\theta]]$ if and o

Theorems & Definitions (17)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Corollary 1.2
  • Theorem 1.3
  • Lemma 2.1
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.2
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.3
  • proof
  • Theorem 2.4
  • ...and 7 more