Table of Contents
Fetching ...

On the pseudorandomness of Parry--Bertrand automatic sequences

Pierre Popoli, Manon Stipulanti

TL;DR

This work investigates the pseudorandomness of a broad family of morphic sequences built from Parry–Bertrand numeration systems, focusing on even-order correlation measures. By blending automata theory with abstract numeration systems, it extends previous results to the $U_\beta$-automatic setting and shows that binary $U_\beta$-automatic sequences have large even-order correlations: $C_{2k}(\mathbf{s},N) \gg N$ for all $k\ge 1$, implying these sequences are not pseudorandom. The authors also demonstrate a genuine difference between even- and odd-order correlations in certain morphic sequences and provide an outline of the proof using a product automaton and carefully constructed morphisms. The findings illuminate the limitations of pseudorandomness in morphic/automatic frameworks and suggest directions for extending the approach to broader numeration systems and sequence classes.

Abstract

The correlation measure is a testimony of the pseudorandomness of a sequence $\infw{s}$ and provides information about the independence of some parts of $\infw{s}$ and their shifts. Combined with the well-distribution measure, a sequence possesses good pseudorandomness properties if both measures are relatively small. In combinatorics on words, the famous $b$-automatic sequences are quite far from being pseudorandom, as they have small factor complexity on the one hand and large well-distribution and correlation measures on the other. This paper investigates the pseudorandomness of a specific family of morphic sequences, including classical $b$-automatic sequences. In particular, we show that such sequences have large even-order correlation measures; hence, they are not pseudorandom. We also show that even- and odd-order correlation measures behave differently when considering some simple morphic sequences.

On the pseudorandomness of Parry--Bertrand automatic sequences

TL;DR

This work investigates the pseudorandomness of a broad family of morphic sequences built from Parry–Bertrand numeration systems, focusing on even-order correlation measures. By blending automata theory with abstract numeration systems, it extends previous results to the -automatic setting and shows that binary -automatic sequences have large even-order correlations: for all , implying these sequences are not pseudorandom. The authors also demonstrate a genuine difference between even- and odd-order correlations in certain morphic sequences and provide an outline of the proof using a product automaton and carefully constructed morphisms. The findings illuminate the limitations of pseudorandomness in morphic/automatic frameworks and suggest directions for extending the approach to broader numeration systems and sequence classes.

Abstract

The correlation measure is a testimony of the pseudorandomness of a sequence and provides information about the independence of some parts of and their shifts. Combined with the well-distribution measure, a sequence possesses good pseudorandomness properties if both measures are relatively small. In combinatorics on words, the famous -automatic sequences are quite far from being pseudorandom, as they have small factor complexity on the one hand and large well-distribution and correlation measures on the other. This paper investigates the pseudorandomness of a specific family of morphic sequences, including classical -automatic sequences. In particular, we show that such sequences have large even-order correlation measures; hence, they are not pseudorandom. We also show that even- and odd-order correlation measures behave differently when considering some simple morphic sequences.
Paper Structure (9 sections, 7 theorems, 14 equations, 3 figures)

This paper contains 9 sections, 7 theorems, 14 equations, 3 figures.

Key Result

theorem 1

Let $b\ge 2$ be an integer and let $\mathbf{s}$ be a $b$-automatic binary sequence generated by a DFAO with $m$ states. Then $C_2(\mathbf{s},N) \ge \frac{N}{b(m+1)}$ for all $N\ge b(m+1)$.

Figures (3)

  • Figure 1: A DFAO producing the sum-of-digit function $\mathbf{s}_F$ modulo $2$ in the Zeckendorf numeration system $F$.
  • Figure 2: A representation of the situation depicted in the proof of \ref{['thm:main']}.
  • Figure 3: The product $\mathcal{P}$ between a DFA for $L_{U}$ (top) and a DFAO for the morphic sequence $\tau(\mathbf{x})$ (right) where $U$, $\mathbf{x}$, and $\tau$ are all defined in \ref{['ex:example non Parry but Bertrand']}.

Theorems & Definitions (12)

  • theorem 1: MW18
  • theorem 2
  • proposition 1: Rigo14-2
  • theorem 3
  • proof
  • remark 1
  • lemma 1
  • proof
  • lemma 2
  • proof
  • ...and 2 more