Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Effects of fiber number and density on fiber jamming: Towards follow-the-leader deployment of a continuum robot

Chen Qian, Tangyou Liu, Liao Wu

TL;DR

To enable precise MIS FTL, the paper studies fiber jamming modules (FJMs) under micro-scale constraints. It develops a theoretical model linking fiber count $N$, fiber diameter $2r$, and packing density to stiffness in jammed and unjammed states via moment-of-inertia terms $I_j$ and $I_{uj}$ and a friction-dependent factor $\epsilon$, yielding a stiffness-variation ratio $\zeta = \frac{R^4}{N r^4}(1-\epsilon)$. The authors fabricate 4 mm FJMs, validate the model experimentally, and identify an optimal configuration (0.4 mm fibers at 56% packing) achieving large stiffness variation (up to thousands of percent) while maintaining usable absolute stiffness. A prototype robot with four FJMs demonstrates FTL motions via tendon actuation and FJM propagation, illustrating practical viability for MIS applications and guiding micro-scale FJM design.

Abstract

Fiber jamming modules (FJMs) offer flexibility and quick stiffness variation, making them suitable for follow-the-leader (FTL) motions in continuum robots, which is ideal for minimally invasive surgery (MIS). However, their potential has not been fully exploited, particularly in designing and manufacturing small-sized FJMs with high stiffness variation. Although existing research has focused on factors like fiber materials and geometry to maximize stiffness variation, the results often do not apply to FJMs for MIS due to size constraints. Meanwhile, other factors such as fiber number and packing density, less significant to large FJMs but critical to small-sized FJMs, have received insufficient investigation regarding their impact on the stiffness variation for FTL deployment. In this paper, we design and fabricate FJMs with a diameter of 4mm. Through theoretical and experimental analysis, we find that fiber number and packing density significantly affect both absolute stiffness and stiffness variation. Our experiments confirm the feasibility of using FJMs in a medical FTL robot design. The optimal configuration is a 4mm FJM with 0.4mm fibers at a 56% packing density, achieving up to 3400% stiffness variation. A video demonstration of a prototype robot using the suggested parameters for achieving FTL motions can be found at https://youtu.be/7pI5U0z7kcE.

Effects of fiber number and density on fiber jamming: Towards follow-the-leader deployment of a continuum robot

TL;DR

To enable precise MIS FTL, the paper studies fiber jamming modules (FJMs) under micro-scale constraints. It develops a theoretical model linking fiber count , fiber diameter , and packing density to stiffness in jammed and unjammed states via moment-of-inertia terms and and a friction-dependent factor , yielding a stiffness-variation ratio . The authors fabricate 4 mm FJMs, validate the model experimentally, and identify an optimal configuration (0.4 mm fibers at 56% packing) achieving large stiffness variation (up to thousands of percent) while maintaining usable absolute stiffness. A prototype robot with four FJMs demonstrates FTL motions via tendon actuation and FJM propagation, illustrating practical viability for MIS applications and guiding micro-scale FJM design.

Abstract

Fiber jamming modules (FJMs) offer flexibility and quick stiffness variation, making them suitable for follow-the-leader (FTL) motions in continuum robots, which is ideal for minimally invasive surgery (MIS). However, their potential has not been fully exploited, particularly in designing and manufacturing small-sized FJMs with high stiffness variation. Although existing research has focused on factors like fiber materials and geometry to maximize stiffness variation, the results often do not apply to FJMs for MIS due to size constraints. Meanwhile, other factors such as fiber number and packing density, less significant to large FJMs but critical to small-sized FJMs, have received insufficient investigation regarding their impact on the stiffness variation for FTL deployment. In this paper, we design and fabricate FJMs with a diameter of 4mm. Through theoretical and experimental analysis, we find that fiber number and packing density significantly affect both absolute stiffness and stiffness variation. Our experiments confirm the feasibility of using FJMs in a medical FTL robot design. The optimal configuration is a 4mm FJM with 0.4mm fibers at a 56% packing density, achieving up to 3400% stiffness variation. A video demonstration of a prototype robot using the suggested parameters for achieving FTL motions can be found at https://youtu.be/7pI5U0z7kcE.
Paper Structure (16 sections, 7 equations, 6 figures, 1 table)

This paper contains 16 sections, 7 equations, 6 figures, 1 table.

Figures (6)

  • Figure 1: (A) Three essential functions to achieve FTL: (A1) Steer the leader or end-effector. (A2) Propagate along the desired trajectory. (A3) Conserve the trajectory's shape. (B) Three categories of jamming mechanism: (B1) granular jamming, (B2) fiber jamming and (B3) layer jamming. (C) Design of continuum robot that contains tendons and FJMs to achieve FTL. (D) Prototype illustrating FTL motion by changing the stiffness of two FJMs: Step 0: All FJMs are jammed. Step 1: Unjam one FJM. Step 2: Propagate the unjammed FJM. Step 3: Pull tendons to steer the tip. Step 4: Jam the first FJM and unjam the second FJM. Step 5: Propagate the second FJM to the first's position. Step 6: Jam the second FJM. The robot is now ready for the next loop. (E) Photos of the prototype demonstrating FTL motion with four tubes.
  • Figure 2: (A) Deflection of an FJM under vertical force in three phases: (I) "pre-slip" phase: No slipping between fibers, FJM behaves as one single beam. (II) "transition regime" phase: shear stress exceeds static friction, fibers slip vertically in layers, horizontal fibers remain unslipped. (III) "full-slip" phase: All fiber layers slip, making jammed and unjammed FJM stiffness similar. (B) Predicted stiffness curves (force vs deflection) of jammed and unjammed FJMs. (C) illustrative stiffness change due to change of moment of the inertia in the "transition regime" phase. (D) Free body diagram of the fiber bundle when not slipped (D1) and slipped (D2).
  • Figure 3: Illustrative factors that increase the coefficient $\epsilon$, which leads to greater friction: (A) The increasing friction force due to higher packing density. (B) The increasing number of contact areas due to more fibers filled in.
  • Figure 4: Manufacturing procedure of FJM: (A1) Acrylic rod in 4mm diameter. (A2) Dipping the rod into a latex container. (A3) Membrane thickness is measured at 0.16mm-0.18mm. (B1) Fiber bundle bounded by the molding tube. (B2) Injecting epoxy resin. (B3) The air hole for vacuuming is generated after removing the centre fiber. (C) Vacuum device is composed of one 50ml syringe, a digital manometer and a 3d-printed frame. -90.3kpa is measured when the syringe is forced to vacuum by the frame. (D) Experimental setup for stiffness test.
  • Figure 5: Experimental result: Force vs deflection plots for FJMs with 0.4mm fibers at the density of 56% (A) and 72% (B). (C) The contour plot of unjammed stiffness. (D) The contour plot of jammed stiffness. (E) The contour plot of stiffness variation ratio. (F) The change of coefficient $\epsilon$ respect to fiber number.
  • ...and 1 more figures