Table of Contents
Fetching ...

MEV Capture and Decentralization in Execution Tickets

Jonah Burian, Davide Crapis, Fahad Saleh

TL;DR

It is shown that large investors that are not builders but have substantial advantage in capital cost can come to dominate the ET market and that MEV capture decreases with risk aversion and capital costs.

Abstract

We provide an economic model of Execution Tickets and use it to study the ability of the Ethereum protocol to capture MEV from block construction. We demonstrate that Execution Tickets extract all MEV when all buyers are homogeneous, risk neutral and face no capital costs. We also show that MEV capture decreases with risk aversion and capital costs. Moreover, when buyers are heterogeneous, MEV capture can be especially low and a single dominant buyer can extract much of the MEV. This adverse effect can be partially mitigated by the presence of a Proposer Builder Separation (PBS) mechanism, which gives ET buyers access to a market of specialized builders, but in practice centralization vectors still persist. With PBS, ETs are concentrated among those with the highest ex-ante MEV extraction ability and lowest cost of capital. We show how it is possible that large investors that are not builders but have substantial advantage in capital cost can come to dominate the ET market.

MEV Capture and Decentralization in Execution Tickets

TL;DR

It is shown that large investors that are not builders but have substantial advantage in capital cost can come to dominate the ET market and that MEV capture decreases with risk aversion and capital costs.

Abstract

We provide an economic model of Execution Tickets and use it to study the ability of the Ethereum protocol to capture MEV from block construction. We demonstrate that Execution Tickets extract all MEV when all buyers are homogeneous, risk neutral and face no capital costs. We also show that MEV capture decreases with risk aversion and capital costs. Moreover, when buyers are heterogeneous, MEV capture can be especially low and a single dominant buyer can extract much of the MEV. This adverse effect can be partially mitigated by the presence of a Proposer Builder Separation (PBS) mechanism, which gives ET buyers access to a market of specialized builders, but in practice centralization vectors still persist. With PBS, ETs are concentrated among those with the highest ex-ante MEV extraction ability and lowest cost of capital. We show how it is possible that large investors that are not builders but have substantial advantage in capital cost can come to dominate the ET market.
Paper Structure (29 sections, 15 theorems, 40 equations, 1 figure)

This paper contains 29 sections, 15 theorems, 40 equations, 1 figure.

Key Result

proposition thmcounterproposition

Equilibrium Solution In general, there exist multiple equilibria. More formally, necessary and sufficient conditions for an equilibrium are that the stationary price, $P$, and ET holdings, $\{ k_b \}_{b \in \mathcal{B}}$ satisfy the following conditions:

Figures (1)

  • Figure 1: This diagram illustrates the separation of duties between Validator, ET Buyer, and Block Builder roles in the presence of APS and PBS mechanisms (duties are below each entity in cursive).

Theorems & Definitions (20)

  • proposition thmcounterproposition
  • corollary thmcountercorollary
  • corollary thmcountercorollary
  • proposition thmcounterproposition
  • proposition thmcounterproposition
  • proposition thmcounterproposition
  • proposition thmcounterproposition
  • corollary thmcountercorollary
  • corollary thmcountercorollary
  • proposition thmcounterproposition
  • ...and 10 more