How common are grand unified theories?
Johannes Herms, Maximilian Ruhdorfer
TL;DR
This work quantifies how frequently the Standard Model fermions can be embedded into representations of simple Grand Unified Theory algebras, using a bottom-up, UV-agnostic notion of unifiability that excludes additional fermions and does not rely on gauge coupling unification. By constructing SM-like theory bases under strict and loose definitions and counting anomaly-free, completely chiral representations up to a maximum dimension $D_{ m max}$ with charge bounds $|Q|<Q_{ m max}$ and a limit on identical irreps $ ilde{S}$, the authors compute the unifiable fraction $r$. They find that near the single-generation SM, unifiability is relatively common (order one in some tightly restricted cases), but becomes exceedingly rare ($<10^{-2}$) as the theory space is broadened to include larger algebras or less restricted chirality; allowing vector-like fermions up to total dimension 30 can raise the fraction by up to a factor of 2. Overall, the results provide a conservative, group-theoretic indication supporting Grand Unification while highlighting the sensitivity to the chosen framework and the absence of a principled probability measure over possible theories.
Abstract
The individual fermion generations of the Standard Model fit neatly into a representation of a simple Grand Unified Theory gauge algebra. If Grand Unification is not realized in nature, this would appear to be a coincidence. We attempt to quantify how frequently this coincidence occurs among theories with group structure and fermion content similar to the Standard Model. While many of the completely chiral, anomaly-free fermion representations of the Standard Model gauge algebra that are no larger than the single generation Standard Model are unifiable, we find that unifiability quickly becomes rare when the analysis is extended to include other gauge algebras or larger representations. This purely group-theoretical analysis may be taken as a bottom-up indication for Grand Unification, conceptually similar to a naturalness argument.
