Most $q$-matroids are not representable
Sebastian Degen, Lukas Kühne
TL;DR
The paper proves that asymptotically almost all $q$-matroids are not representable. It develops a two-pronged approach: a coding-theoretic lower bound showing the total number of $q$-matroids $ \mathcal N_q(n)$ grows at least as $2^{q^{c n^2}}$, and a zero-pattern-based upper bound showing the number of representable $q$-matroids $ \mathcal R_q(n)$ grows at most like $q^{c' n^2}$ for some constants $c,c'$. Consequently, the ratio $ \mathcal R_q(n)/\u000a\mathcal N_q(n)$ tends to zero as $n\to\infty$, establishing a $q$-analogue of Nelson's theorem. The results hinge on linking constant-dimension codes to paving $q$-matroids and exploiting the algebraic structure of zero patterns in determinant-type polynomials. This provides a negative answer to Jurrius and Pellikaan's representability question, illuminating the landscape of $q$-matroids in coding-theoretic contexts.
Abstract
A $q$-matroid is the analogue of a matroid which arises by replacing the finite ground set of a matroid with a finite-dimensional vector space over a finite field. These $q$-matroids are motivated by coding theory as the representable $q$-matroids are the ones that stem from rank-metric codes. In this note, we establish a $q$-analogue of Nelson's theorem in matroid theory by proving that asymptotically almost all $q$-matroids are not representable. This answers a question about representable $q$-matroids by Jurrius and Pellikaan strongly in the negative.
