Table of Contents
Fetching ...

A characterization for an almost MDS code to be a near MDS code and a proof of the Geng-Yang-Zhang-Zhou conjecture

Shiyuan Qiang, Huakai Wei, Shaofang Hong

TL;DR

The paper derives a general criterion: the dual of an AMDS code is AMDS if and only if the shortened codes satisfy $\dim\mathcal{C}(I)=1$ for all $I$ with $|I|=n-k+1$, using MacWilliams identities. It then verifies this condition for the BCH code $\mathcal{C}_{(q,q+1,3,4)}$ with $q=3^m$ odd by exploiting the $\,(q+1)$-th roots of unity group and a determinant-based characterization, showing the dual is AMDS with $[q+1,4,q-3]$. Consequently, $\mathcal{C}_{(q,q+1,3,4)}$ is NMDS. This confirms the Geng–Yang–Zhang–Zhou conjecture and highlights a practical criterion to certify NMDS status via dual AMDS properties.

Abstract

Let $\mathbb{F}_q$ be the finite field of $q$ elements, where $q=p^{m}$ with $p$ being a prime number and $m$ being a positive integer. Let $\mathcal{C}_{(q, n, δ, h)}$ be a class of BCH codes of length $n$ and designed $δ$. A linear code $\mathcal{C}$ is said to be maximum distance separable (MDS) if the minimum distance $d=n-k+1$. If $d=n-k$, then $\mathcal{C}$ is called an almost MDS (AMDS) code. Moreover, if both of $\mathcal{C}$ and its dual code $\mathcal{C}^{\bot}$ are AMDS, then $\mathcal{C}$ is called a near MDS (NMDS) code. In [A class of almost MDS codes, {\it Finite Fields Appl.} {\bf 79} (2022), \#101996], Geng, Yang, Zhang and Zhou proved that the BCH code $\mathcal{C}_{(q, q+1,3,4)}$ is an almost MDS code, where $q=3^m$ and $m$ is an odd integer, and they also showed that its parameters is $[q+1, q-3, 4]$. Furthermore, they proposed a conjecture stating that the dual code $\mathcal{C}^{\bot}_{(q, q+1, 3, 4)}$ is also an AMDS code with parameters $[q+1, 4, q-3]$. In this paper, we first present a characterization for the dual code of an almost MDS code to be an almost MDS code. Then we use this result to show that the Geng-Yang-Zhang-Zhou conjecture is true. Our result together with the Geng-Yang-Zhang-Zhou theorem implies that the BCH code $\mathcal{C}_{(q, q+1,3,4)}$ is a near MDS code.

A characterization for an almost MDS code to be a near MDS code and a proof of the Geng-Yang-Zhang-Zhou conjecture

TL;DR

The paper derives a general criterion: the dual of an AMDS code is AMDS if and only if the shortened codes satisfy for all with , using MacWilliams identities. It then verifies this condition for the BCH code with odd by exploiting the -th roots of unity group and a determinant-based characterization, showing the dual is AMDS with . Consequently, is NMDS. This confirms the Geng–Yang–Zhang–Zhou conjecture and highlights a practical criterion to certify NMDS status via dual AMDS properties.

Abstract

Let be the finite field of elements, where with being a prime number and being a positive integer. Let be a class of BCH codes of length and designed . A linear code is said to be maximum distance separable (MDS) if the minimum distance . If , then is called an almost MDS (AMDS) code. Moreover, if both of and its dual code are AMDS, then is called a near MDS (NMDS) code. In [A class of almost MDS codes, {\it Finite Fields Appl.} {\bf 79} (2022), \#101996], Geng, Yang, Zhang and Zhou proved that the BCH code is an almost MDS code, where and is an odd integer, and they also showed that its parameters is . Furthermore, they proposed a conjecture stating that the dual code is also an AMDS code with parameters . In this paper, we first present a characterization for the dual code of an almost MDS code to be an almost MDS code. Then we use this result to show that the Geng-Yang-Zhang-Zhou conjecture is true. Our result together with the Geng-Yang-Zhang-Zhou theorem implies that the BCH code is a near MDS code.
Paper Structure (3 sections, 22 theorems, 141 equations)

This paper contains 3 sections, 22 theorems, 141 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

[GYZZ-FFA22] Let $q=3^m$ with $m\geq3$ being odd. Then the BCH code $\mathcal{C}_{(q, q+1, 3, 4)}$ is an AMDS code with parameters $[q+1, q-3, 4]$.

Theorems & Definitions (38)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Theorem 1.2
  • Theorem 1.3
  • Lemma 2.1
  • Lemma 2.2
  • Lemma 2.3
  • Lemma 2.4
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.5
  • proof
  • ...and 28 more