Strategy Game-Playing with Size-Constrained State Abstraction
Linjie Xu, Diego Perez-Liebana, Alexander Dockhorn
TL;DR
Strategy games create very large search spaces that challenge MCTS-based planning. The authors propose size-constrained state abstraction (SCSA), which caps the number of ground states per abstract node to avoid mid-search abandonment and reduce hyperparameter sensitivity. Empirical tests in three Stratega games show SCSA outperforms baseline abstractions and achieves competitive results with Elastic MCTS in more complex settings, with open-sourced code at https://github.com/GAIGResearch/Stratega. The work analyzes compression rates to reveal a trade-off between memory usage and performance, and demonstrates robust, domain-general performance across variants.
Abstract
Playing strategy games is a challenging problem for artificial intelligence (AI). One of the major challenges is the large search space due to a diverse set of game components. In recent works, state abstraction has been applied to search-based game AI and has brought significant performance improvements. State abstraction techniques rely on reducing the search space, e.g., by aggregating similar states. However, the application of these abstractions is hindered because the quality of an abstraction is difficult to evaluate. Previous works hence abandon the abstraction in the middle of the search to not bias the search to a local optimum. This mechanism introduces a hyper-parameter to decide the time to abandon the current state abstraction. In this work, we propose a size-constrained state abstraction (SCSA), an approach that limits the maximum number of nodes being grouped together. We found that with SCSA, the abstraction is not required to be abandoned. Our empirical results on $3$ strategy games show that the SCSA agent outperforms the previous methods and yields robust performance over different games. Codes are open-sourced at https://github.com/GAIGResearch/Stratega.
