Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Distribution Aggregation via Continuous Thiele's Rules

Jonathan Wagner, Reshef Meir

Abstract

We introduce the class of \textit{Continuous Thiele's Rules} that generalize the familiar \textbf{Thiele's rules} \cite{janson2018phragmens} of multi-winner voting to distribution aggregation problems. Each rule in that class maximizes $\sum_if(π^i)$ where $π^i$ is an agent $i$'s satisfaction and $f$ could be any twice differentiable, increasing and concave real function. Based on a single quantity we call the \textit{'Inequality Aversion'} of $f$ (elsewhere known as "Relative Risk Aversion"), we derive bounds on the Egalitarian loss, welfare loss and the approximation of \textit{Average Fair Share}, leading to a quantifiable, continuous presentation of their inevitable trade-offs. In particular, we show that the Nash Product Rule satisfies\textit{ Average Fair Share} in our setting.

Distribution Aggregation via Continuous Thiele's Rules

Abstract

We introduce the class of \textit{Continuous Thiele's Rules} that generalize the familiar \textbf{Thiele's rules} \cite{janson2018phragmens} of multi-winner voting to distribution aggregation problems. Each rule in that class maximizes where is an agent 's satisfaction and could be any twice differentiable, increasing and concave real function. Based on a single quantity we call the \textit{'Inequality Aversion'} of (elsewhere known as "Relative Risk Aversion"), we derive bounds on the Egalitarian loss, welfare loss and the approximation of \textit{Average Fair Share}, leading to a quantifiable, continuous presentation of their inevitable trade-offs. In particular, we show that the Nash Product Rule satisfies\textit{ Average Fair Share} in our setting.
Paper Structure (15 sections, 10 theorems, 43 equations, 2 figures, 1 table)

This paper contains 15 sections, 10 theorems, 43 equations, 2 figures, 1 table.

Key Result

Proposition 1

$x \in \arg \max_{y \in \Delta^m}\sum_i f(\pi^{i}_{y})$ if and only if

Figures (2)

  • Figure 1: Green lines show welfare loss upper bounds, scarlet lines show Egalitarian loss. Thick lines are for $m=15$ and $n=100$, dashed lines for $m=3$ and $n=20$.
  • Figure :

Theorems & Definitions (30)

  • Definition 1
  • Definition 2: Continuous Thiele's Aggregation Rules
  • Definition 3
  • Definition 5: marginal contributions
  • Proposition 1: MRS condition
  • Proposition 2
  • proof
  • Proposition 3
  • proof
  • Example 4
  • ...and 20 more