Table of Contents
Fetching ...

The weak Extension Principle

Alessandro Vignati, Deniz Yilmaz

TL;DR

The paper investigates rigidity phenomena for maps between Čech–Stone remainders $X^*$ under forcing axioms, focusing on the weak Extension Principle $\mathsf{wEP}(X,Y)$. It extends Farah's dimension-based reductions to locally compact noncompact second countable spaces and develops a lift-based framework via Gel'fand duality for abelian corona $\mathrm{C^*}$-algebras under $\mathsf{OCA}$ and $\mathsf{MA}_{\aleph_1}$. The main result shows $\mathsf{wEP}$ holds unconditionally in the considered setting, implying no continuous surjection $(X^*)^\kappa\to (Y^*)^\lambda$ exists when $\kappa<\lambda$, while CH would allow many surjections; the proof assembles local liftings into a global one using a strong rigidity lifting theorem. This work advances the understanding of rigidity of maps between Čech–Stone remainders and informs the noncommutative extensions via corona algebras under set-theoretic axioms.

Abstract

We prove a rigidity result for maps between Čech-Stone remainders under fairly mild forcing axioms.

The weak Extension Principle

TL;DR

The paper investigates rigidity phenomena for maps between Čech–Stone remainders under forcing axioms, focusing on the weak Extension Principle . It extends Farah's dimension-based reductions to locally compact noncompact second countable spaces and develops a lift-based framework via Gel'fand duality for abelian corona -algebras under and . The main result shows holds unconditionally in the considered setting, implying no continuous surjection exists when , while CH would allow many surjections; the proof assembles local liftings into a global one using a strong rigidity lifting theorem. This work advances the understanding of rigidity of maps between Čech–Stone remainders and informs the noncommutative extensions via corona algebras under set-theoretic axioms.

Abstract

We prove a rigidity result for maps between Čech-Stone remainders under fairly mild forcing axioms.
Paper Structure (2 sections, 5 theorems, 22 equations)

This paper contains 2 sections, 5 theorems, 22 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.2

Assume $\mathop{\mathrm{\mathsf {OCA}}}\nolimits$ and $\mathop{\mathrm{\mathsf {MA}_{\aleph_1}}}\nolimits$. Then $\mathop{\mathrm{\mathsf {wEP}}}\nolimits$ holds.

Theorems & Definitions (17)

  • Definition 1.1
  • Theorem 1.2
  • Theorem 2.1
  • Proposition 2.2
  • proof
  • Proposition 2.3
  • proof
  • proof : Proof of Theorem \ref{['thm:main']}
  • Claim 2.4
  • proof
  • ...and 7 more