Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Reflexive homology and involutive Hochschild homology as equivariant Loday constructions

Ayelet Lindenstrauss, Birgit Richter

TL;DR

The work unifies reflexive homology and involutive Hochschild homology with equivariant Loday constructions for the group $C_2$, showing that under $2$-invertibility and flatness of the underlying module, these theories coincide with the homotopy groups of the $C_2$-equivariant Loday construction on the fixed-point Tambara functor evaluated at the trivial orbit. It extends to a relative setting over a commutative ground ring $k$ and elucidates the role of the flip circle $S^{\sigma}$ in producing a bar-model for the constructions. The paper also analyzes edge cases where $2$ is not invertible, showing failure of the identifications for $\underline{\mathbb{F}_2}^c$ and $\underline{\mathbb{Z}}^c$, and finally extends the results to associative rings with anti-involution via a modified norm structure. Together, these results provide a coherent framework linking algebraic and equivariant homologies through Loday-type constructions and their fixed-point data, with implications for Real/Hochschild-type theories and potential extensions to higher dihedral contexts.

Abstract

For associative rings with anti-involution several homology theories exists, for instance reflexive homology as studied by Graves and involutive Hochschild homology defined by Fernàndez-València and Giansiracusa. We prove that the corresponding homology groups can be identified with the homotopy groups of an equivariant Loday construction of the one-point compactification of the sign-representation evaluated at the trivial orbit, if we assume that $2$ is invertible and if the underlying abelian group of the ring is flat. We also show a relative version where we consider an associative $k$-algebra with an anti-involution where $k$ is an arbitrary ground ring.

Reflexive homology and involutive Hochschild homology as equivariant Loday constructions

TL;DR

The work unifies reflexive homology and involutive Hochschild homology with equivariant Loday constructions for the group , showing that under -invertibility and flatness of the underlying module, these theories coincide with the homotopy groups of the -equivariant Loday construction on the fixed-point Tambara functor evaluated at the trivial orbit. It extends to a relative setting over a commutative ground ring and elucidates the role of the flip circle in producing a bar-model for the constructions. The paper also analyzes edge cases where is not invertible, showing failure of the identifications for and , and finally extends the results to associative rings with anti-involution via a modified norm structure. Together, these results provide a coherent framework linking algebraic and equivariant homologies through Loday-type constructions and their fixed-point data, with implications for Real/Hochschild-type theories and potential extensions to higher dihedral contexts.

Abstract

For associative rings with anti-involution several homology theories exists, for instance reflexive homology as studied by Graves and involutive Hochschild homology defined by Fernàndez-València and Giansiracusa. We prove that the corresponding homology groups can be identified with the homotopy groups of an equivariant Loday construction of the one-point compactification of the sign-representation evaluated at the trivial orbit, if we assume that is invertible and if the underlying abelian group of the ring is flat. We also show a relative version where we consider an associative -algebra with an anti-involution where is an arbitrary ground ring.
Paper Structure (11 sections, 23 theorems, 94 equations)

This paper contains 11 sections, 23 theorems, 94 equations.

Key Result

Lemma 3.2

Assume that $M$ and $N$ are two abelian groups with involution and assume that $2$ is invertible in $M$ or in $N$. Then there is an equivalence of $C_2$-Mackey functors which is natural in $M$ and $N$. Here $C_2$ acts on $M\otimes N$ by the diagonal action. If, in addition, $M$ and $N$ are both commutative rings with involution, then $\underline M^\mathrm{fix}$, $\underline N^\mathrm{fix}$, and $

Theorems & Definitions (51)

  • Remark 3.1
  • Lemma 3.2
  • proof
  • Lemma 3.3
  • proof
  • Proposition 4.1
  • proof
  • Lemma 4.2
  • proof
  • Theorem 4.3
  • ...and 41 more