Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Deep Image Priors for Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting with pretrained Bloch-consistent denoising autoencoders

Perla Mayo, Matteo Cencini, Ketan Fatania, Carolin M. Pirkl, Marion I. Menzel, Bjoern H. Menze, Michela Tosetti, Mohammad Golbabaee

TL;DR

This work tackles the challenge of recovering quantitative MR parameter maps from undersampled MRF data by integrating a Deep Image Prior with a Bloch-consistent denoising autoencoder (B_DAE). The proposed BARDIP framework combines a pretrained Bloch-consistent autoencoder with a DIP-based Unet prior and a data-consistency plus Bloch-regularized multitask loss, enabling ground-truth-free reconstruction with substantially faster convergence than prior DIP-MRF approaches. Quantitative results on simulated and in-vivo brain data show BARDIP achieving lower $T1$ and $T2$ errors (MAPE) and competitive $PD$ quality, often stabilizing within 1k–10k iterations. The method offers a practical, ground-truth-free alternative for fast, reliable multi-parametric mapping in MRI, with potential impact on clinical workflows due to reduced scan times and improved robustness.

Abstract

The estimation of multi-parametric quantitative maps from Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting (MRF) compressed sampled acquisitions, albeit successful, remains a challenge due to the high underspampling rate and artifacts naturally occuring during image reconstruction. Whilst state-of-the-art DL methods can successfully address the task, to fully exploit their capabilities they often require training on a paired dataset, in an area where ground truth is seldom available. In this work, we propose a method that combines a deep image prior (DIP) module that, without ground truth and in conjunction with a Bloch consistency enforcing autoencoder, can tackle the problem, resulting in a method faster and of equivalent or better accuracy than DIP-MRF.

Deep Image Priors for Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting with pretrained Bloch-consistent denoising autoencoders

TL;DR

This work tackles the challenge of recovering quantitative MR parameter maps from undersampled MRF data by integrating a Deep Image Prior with a Bloch-consistent denoising autoencoder (B_DAE). The proposed BARDIP framework combines a pretrained Bloch-consistent autoencoder with a DIP-based Unet prior and a data-consistency plus Bloch-regularized multitask loss, enabling ground-truth-free reconstruction with substantially faster convergence than prior DIP-MRF approaches. Quantitative results on simulated and in-vivo brain data show BARDIP achieving lower and errors (MAPE) and competitive quality, often stabilizing within 1k–10k iterations. The method offers a practical, ground-truth-free alternative for fast, reliable multi-parametric mapping in MRI, with potential impact on clinical workflows due to reduced scan times and improved robustness.

Abstract

The estimation of multi-parametric quantitative maps from Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting (MRF) compressed sampled acquisitions, albeit successful, remains a challenge due to the high underspampling rate and artifacts naturally occuring during image reconstruction. Whilst state-of-the-art DL methods can successfully address the task, to fully exploit their capabilities they often require training on a paired dataset, in an area where ground truth is seldom available. In this work, we propose a method that combines a deep image prior (DIP) module that, without ground truth and in conjunction with a Bloch consistency enforcing autoencoder, can tackle the problem, resulting in a method faster and of equivalent or better accuracy than DIP-MRF.
Paper Structure (10 sections, 4 equations, 3 figures, 1 table)

This paper contains 10 sections, 4 equations, 3 figures, 1 table.

Figures (3)

  • Figure 1: (a) Proposed pipeline composed of three neural networks, two of them pretrained. The computation of the forward operator as well as the use of the $\textbf{B}_{\textbf{DAE}}$ module enforce the consistency with the data acquisition model and the Bloch equations. (b) Unet used for the experiments reported.
  • Figure 2: T1/T2 reconstruction errors vs iterations for learned approaches on simulated data. Dashed lines indicate the lowest value found across all iterations for the respective approach. Top: SNR 40. Bottom: SNR 35.
  • Figure 3: Tissue maps of the estimations of both approaches on the single slice of real data assessed with L=1000 and L=500. T1 and T2 are in seconds.