Improving engagement, diversity, and retention in computer science with RadGrad: Results of a case study
Philip M. Johnson, Carleton Moore, Peter Leong, Seungoh Paek
TL;DR
RadGrad interventions address the challenge of traditional CS curriculum changes by offering an opt-in platform that blends social networking, degree planning, and serious games to broaden progress metrics beyond GPA. The authors conduct a qualitative case study across four stakeholder groups to evaluate RadGrad's impact on engagement, retention, and diversity, acknowledging confounding factors including COVID-19. Findings provide evidence that RadGrad can enhance engagement and foster communities of practice, and they offer a flexible, open-source framework that institutions can tailor to their contexts; however, evidence for retention and diversity is less robust and faculty adoption is uneven. Overall, RadGrad shows promise as part of a broader institutional strategy to diversify and sustain CS programs, with clear implications for adoptability and further cross-institution evaluation.
Abstract
RadGrad is a curriculum initiative implemented via an application that combines features of social networks, degree planners, individual learning plans, and serious games. RadGrad redefines traditional meanings of "progress" and "success" in the undergraduate computer science degree program in an attempt to improve engagement, retention, and diversity. In this paper, we describe the RadGrad Project and report on an evaluation study designed to assess the impact of RadGrad on student engagement, diversity, and retention. We also present opportunities and challenges that result from the use of the system.
