Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Unital k-Restricted Infinity-Operads

Amartya Shekhar Dubey, Yu Leon Liu

TL;DR

This work develops a unital ∞-operad framework refined by arity restrictions. By modeling unital k-restricted ∞-operads as complete Segal presheaves on closed k-dendroidal trees Ω^c_{≤k}, the authors prove that restriction functors admit fully faithful left and right adjoints, given by left and right Kan extensions that preserve completeness. They establish a canonical filtration and cofiltration O → L_kO and O → R_kO, provide explicit multi-ary morphism descriptions (via colimits and limits over ≤k-ary data), and connect the constructions to familiar operadic families (A_∞ and E_n via Fulton–MacPherson models). The results supply a robust arity-controlled approach to unital ∞-operads and open avenues for extending to non-closed trees and lifting obstruction theories in operadic contexts.

Abstract

We study unital $\infty$-operads by their arity restrictions. Given $k \geq 1$, we develop a model for unital $k$-restricted $\infty$-operads, which are variants of $\infty$-operads which has only $(\leq k)$-arity morphisms, as complete Segal presheaves on closed $k$-dendroidal trees, which are closed trees build from corollas with valences $\leq k$. Furthermore, we prove that the restriction functors from unital $\infty$-operads to unital $k$-restricted $\infty$-operads admit fully faithful left and right adjoints by showing that the left and right Kan extensions preserve complete Segal objects. Varying $k$, the left and right adjoints give a filtration and a co-filtration for any unital $\infty$-operads by $k$-restricted $\infty$-operads.

Unital k-Restricted Infinity-Operads

TL;DR

This work develops a unital ∞-operad framework refined by arity restrictions. By modeling unital k-restricted ∞-operads as complete Segal presheaves on closed k-dendroidal trees Ω^c_{≤k}, the authors prove that restriction functors admit fully faithful left and right adjoints, given by left and right Kan extensions that preserve completeness. They establish a canonical filtration and cofiltration O → L_kO and O → R_kO, provide explicit multi-ary morphism descriptions (via colimits and limits over ≤k-ary data), and connect the constructions to familiar operadic families (A_∞ and E_n via Fulton–MacPherson models). The results supply a robust arity-controlled approach to unital ∞-operads and open avenues for extending to non-closed trees and lifting obstruction theories in operadic contexts.

Abstract

We study unital -operads by their arity restrictions. Given , we develop a model for unital -restricted -operads, which are variants of -operads which has only -arity morphisms, as complete Segal presheaves on closed -dendroidal trees, which are closed trees build from corollas with valences . Furthermore, we prove that the restriction functors from unital -operads to unital -restricted -operads admit fully faithful left and right adjoints by showing that the left and right Kan extensions preserve complete Segal objects. Varying , the left and right adjoints give a filtration and a co-filtration for any unital -operads by -restricted -operads.
Paper Structure (15 sections, 31 theorems, 60 equations)

This paper contains 15 sections, 31 theorems, 60 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.2

Given $1 \leq k \leq j \leq \infty$, the natural restriction functor $(-)^k \colon \mathrm{Op}^{\mathrm{un}}_{\leq {j}} \to \mathrm{Op}^{\mathrm{un}}_{\leq {k}}$ admits a fully faithful left adjoint $\mathrm{L}_k$ as well as a fully faithful right adjoint $\mathrm{R}_k$, given by left and right Kan

Theorems & Definitions (73)

  • Theorem 1.2: \ref{['thm:left-adjoint-theorem']}, \ref{['thm:right-adjoint-theorem']}
  • Example 2.1
  • Example 2.2
  • Example 2.3
  • Definition 2.4
  • Remark 2.6
  • Definition 2.8
  • Proposition 2.10
  • proof
  • Remark 2.13
  • ...and 63 more