Table of Contents
Fetching ...

A DeepONet for inverting the Neumann-to-Dirichlet Operator in Electrical Impedance Tomography: An approximation theoretic perspective and numerical results

Anuj Abhishek, Thilo Strauss

TL;DR

The paper tackles the inverse problem in Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) of recovering the internal conductivity $\gamma$ from boundary current-to-voltage data by learning an operator-to-function map from the Neumann-to-Dirichlet operator to conductivity using a DeepONet. It establishes an approximation-theoretic guarantee showing the operator map can be approximated to arbitrary accuracy by composing an encoder, a neural approximator, and a reconstructor, while quantifying three error sources: approximator, encoder, and reconstructor. The authors implement the architecture under the Complete Electrode Model with a practical 16-electrode setup, generate a large synthetic dataset via a finite-element PDE solver, and demonstrate that DeepONet yields more accurate and localized reconstructions of anomalies than the Iteratively Regularized Gauss-Newton (IRGN) baseline, even in the presence of noise. This work provides both theoretical guarantees and empirical evidence that neural-operator approaches can effectively solve operator-to-function mappings in EIT, offering a path toward interpretable and robust non-invasive conductivity imaging.

Abstract

In this work, we consider the non-invasive medical imaging modality of Electrical Impedance Tomography, where the problem is to recover the conductivity in a medium from a set of data that arises out of a current-to-voltage map (Neumann-to-Dirichlet operator) defined on the boundary of the medium. We formulate this inverse problem as an operator-learning problem where the goal is to learn the implicitly defined operator-to-function map between the space of Neumann-to-Dirichlet operators to the space of admissible conductivities. Subsequently, we use an operator-learning architecture, popularly called DeepONets, to learn this operator-to-function map. Thus far, most of the operator learning architectures have been implemented to learn operators between function spaces. In this work, we generalize the earlier works and use a DeepONet to actually {learn an operator-to-function} map. We provide a Universal Approximation Theorem type result which guarantees that this implicitly defined operator-to-function map between the space of Neumann-to-Dirichlet operator to the space of conductivity function can be approximated to an arbitrary degree using such a DeepONet. Furthermore, we provide a computational implementation of our proposed approach and compare it against a standard baseline. We show that the proposed approach achieves good reconstructions and outperforms the baseline method in our experiments.

A DeepONet for inverting the Neumann-to-Dirichlet Operator in Electrical Impedance Tomography: An approximation theoretic perspective and numerical results

TL;DR

The paper tackles the inverse problem in Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) of recovering the internal conductivity from boundary current-to-voltage data by learning an operator-to-function map from the Neumann-to-Dirichlet operator to conductivity using a DeepONet. It establishes an approximation-theoretic guarantee showing the operator map can be approximated to arbitrary accuracy by composing an encoder, a neural approximator, and a reconstructor, while quantifying three error sources: approximator, encoder, and reconstructor. The authors implement the architecture under the Complete Electrode Model with a practical 16-electrode setup, generate a large synthetic dataset via a finite-element PDE solver, and demonstrate that DeepONet yields more accurate and localized reconstructions of anomalies than the Iteratively Regularized Gauss-Newton (IRGN) baseline, even in the presence of noise. This work provides both theoretical guarantees and empirical evidence that neural-operator approaches can effectively solve operator-to-function mappings in EIT, offering a path toward interpretable and robust non-invasive conductivity imaging.

Abstract

In this work, we consider the non-invasive medical imaging modality of Electrical Impedance Tomography, where the problem is to recover the conductivity in a medium from a set of data that arises out of a current-to-voltage map (Neumann-to-Dirichlet operator) defined on the boundary of the medium. We formulate this inverse problem as an operator-learning problem where the goal is to learn the implicitly defined operator-to-function map between the space of Neumann-to-Dirichlet operators to the space of admissible conductivities. Subsequently, we use an operator-learning architecture, popularly called DeepONets, to learn this operator-to-function map. Thus far, most of the operator learning architectures have been implemented to learn operators between function spaces. In this work, we generalize the earlier works and use a DeepONet to actually {learn an operator-to-function} map. We provide a Universal Approximation Theorem type result which guarantees that this implicitly defined operator-to-function map between the space of Neumann-to-Dirichlet operator to the space of conductivity function can be approximated to an arbitrary degree using such a DeepONet. Furthermore, we provide a computational implementation of our proposed approach and compare it against a standard baseline. We show that the proposed approach achieves good reconstructions and outperforms the baseline method in our experiments.
Paper Structure (20 sections, 8 theorems, 24 equations, 3 figures, 3 tables)

This paper contains 20 sections, 8 theorems, 24 equations, 3 figures, 3 tables.

Key Result

Theorem 3.1

\newlabellem:20 Consider the sets $\mathbb{H}_{r}, D_{\Lambda}$, $\tilde{ \Gamma}$, and $\mathcal{G}^{\dagger}_{\text{ext}}$ as above. Note $D_{\Lambda}$ is a compact set of $\mathbb{H}_{r}$. We will show that $\forall \epsilon >0$, there exist numbers $M \text{ and }P$ and continuous maps $\mathc

Figures (3)

  • Figure 1: The true map $\mathcal{G}^{\dagger}_{\text{ext}}$ is approximated by a composition of three maps, encoder $\mathcal{E}$, approximator $\mathcal{A}$ and reconstructor $\mathcal{R}$. The resultant error in the approximation thus comprises of encoder, approximator, and reconstructor errors.
  • Figure 1: Comparison of reconstructions of our DeepONet with the classical IRGN method. We observe that the DeepONet obtains much closer $\sigma$ values to the ground Truth in the anomalous regions. The white line in the ground truth is the cut at which the plot on the right hand side is displayed.
  • Figure 2: DeepONet architecture used in this manuscript. It feeds the EIT measurements into a Branch Net and 2d point on $\Omega$ into a Trunk Net. The outputs of both networks are combined via an inner product to predict the $\sigma_{x, y}$ at points $(x, y)$.

Theorems & Definitions (11)

  • Definition 1.1
  • Theorem 3.1
  • Proof 1
  • Lemma 3.2
  • Lemma 3.3
  • Lemma 7.1
  • Proof 2
  • Theorem 7.2
  • Lemma 7.3
  • Lemma 7.4
  • ...and 1 more