Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Proper topological complexity

Jose M. Garcia-Calcines, Aniceto Murillo

TL;DR

The paper defines proper topological complexity ${ m pTC}(X)$ as a motion-planning invariant that accounts for avoiding any compact 'unsafe' region, and situates it within exterior homotopy theory by showing ${ m pTC}(X)={ m eTC}(X_{cc})={ m e ext{-}secat}( abla_{X_{cc}})$ (or equivalently ${ m e ext{-}secat}( abla_X)$). It develops the exterior and proper sectional categories ${ m e ext{-}secat}$ and ${ m p ext{-}secat}$, along with cohomological lower bounds and product inequalities, to establish a robust, functorial framework for noncompact spaces. The exterior-topological-complexity bridge yields a toolkit of invariants that behave well under exterior homotopy, with precise bounds and a suite of nontrivial examples illustrating how ${ m pTC}$ can differ from the classical ${ m TC}$ in noncompact settings. The paper concludes with applications to robotics via a relative-topological-complexity notion ${ m TC}(Y,Z)$, demonstrating how constraints on paths remaining within a subregion can be captured by ${ m pTC}$ and related invariants, thus providing a principled approach to planning under safety constraints. $$${ abla}$$ and cocompact externology play central roles in making these invariants functorial and computable for a broad class of spaces.$$

Abstract

We introduce and study the proper topological complexity of a given configuration space, a version of the classical invariant for which we require that the algorithm controlling the motion is able to avoid any possible choice of ``unsafe'' area. To make it a homotopy functorial invariant we characterize it as a particular instance of the exterior sectional category of an exterior map, an invariant of the exterior homotopy category which is also deeply analyzed.

Proper topological complexity

TL;DR

The paper defines proper topological complexity as a motion-planning invariant that accounts for avoiding any compact 'unsafe' region, and situates it within exterior homotopy theory by showing (or equivalently ). It develops the exterior and proper sectional categories and , along with cohomological lower bounds and product inequalities, to establish a robust, functorial framework for noncompact spaces. The exterior-topological-complexity bridge yields a toolkit of invariants that behave well under exterior homotopy, with precise bounds and a suite of nontrivial examples illustrating how can differ from the classical in noncompact settings. The paper concludes with applications to robotics via a relative-topological-complexity notion , demonstrating how constraints on paths remaining within a subregion can be captured by and related invariants, thus providing a principled approach to planning under safety constraints. and cocompact externology play central roles in making these invariants functorial and computable for a broad class of spaces.$$

Abstract

We introduce and study the proper topological complexity of a given configuration space, a version of the classical invariant for which we require that the algorithm controlling the motion is able to avoid any possible choice of ``unsafe'' area. To make it a homotopy functorial invariant we characterize it as a particular instance of the exterior sectional category of an exterior map, an invariant of the exterior homotopy category which is also deeply analyzed.
Paper Structure (5 sections, 23 theorems, 62 equations, 1 figure)

This paper contains 5 sections, 23 theorems, 62 equations, 1 figure.

Key Result

Theorem 3

where $X_{cc}$ denotes the space $X$ endowed with the cocompact externology. As in the exterior homotopy category $q$ can be replaced by the diagonal we also have

Figures (1)

  • Figure :

Theorems & Definitions (58)

  • Definition 1
  • Definition 2
  • Theorem 3
  • Definition 2.1
  • Remark 2.2
  • Proposition 2.3
  • proof
  • Remark 2.4
  • Lemma 2.5
  • proof
  • ...and 48 more