Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Maximal subgroups of maximal rank in the classical algebraic groups

Vanthana Ganeshalingam, Damian Sercombe, Laura Voggesberger

TL;DR

The paper advances a complete combinatorial classification of index-conjugacy classes for isotropic maximal reductive subgroups of maximal rank in classical absolutely simple $k$-groups, extending the framework of the index and embeddings of indices to the classical Dynkin types. It develops and uses the (Tits) index $\mathcal{I}(G)$, the embedding of indices, and the notion of abstract indices along with almost primitive subsystems to reduce the problem to discrete data, subsequently realized in explicit tables for $A_n$, $B_n$, $C_n$, and $D_n$ (including $D_4$). The authors provide an algorithmic approach (with Julia/Oscar code) to enumerate embeddings and derive consequences such as realizability over fields of cohomological dimension $1$, $\mathbb{R}$, or $\mathfrak{p}$-adic fields, and a subexponential growth bound $N(\Phi)=O(n^{c\log n})$ (sharper $O(n)$ for separably closed $k$). These results complete the parallel program to S for the exceptional and classical groups, offering a detailed map between combinatorial index data and concrete algebraic subgroup realizations with implications for field realizability and asymptotics in rank.

Abstract

Let $k$ be an arbitrary field. We classify the maximal reductive subgroups of maximal rank in any classical simple algebraic $k$-group in terms of combinatorial data associated to their indices. This result complements [S, 2022], which does the same for the exceptional groups. We determine which of these subgroups may be realised over a finite field, the real numbers, or over a $\mathfrak{p}$-adic field. We also look at the asymptotics of the number of such subgroups as the rank grows large.

Maximal subgroups of maximal rank in the classical algebraic groups

TL;DR

The paper advances a complete combinatorial classification of index-conjugacy classes for isotropic maximal reductive subgroups of maximal rank in classical absolutely simple -groups, extending the framework of the index and embeddings of indices to the classical Dynkin types. It develops and uses the (Tits) index , the embedding of indices, and the notion of abstract indices along with almost primitive subsystems to reduce the problem to discrete data, subsequently realized in explicit tables for , , , and (including ). The authors provide an algorithmic approach (with Julia/Oscar code) to enumerate embeddings and derive consequences such as realizability over fields of cohomological dimension , , or -adic fields, and a subexponential growth bound (sharper for separably closed ). These results complete the parallel program to S for the exceptional and classical groups, offering a detailed map between combinatorial index data and concrete algebraic subgroup realizations with implications for field realizability and asymptotics in rank.

Abstract

Let be an arbitrary field. We classify the maximal reductive subgroups of maximal rank in any classical simple algebraic -group in terms of combinatorial data associated to their indices. This result complements [S, 2022], which does the same for the exceptional groups. We determine which of these subgroups may be realised over a finite field, the real numbers, or over a -adic field. We also look at the asymptotics of the number of such subgroups as the rank grows large.
Paper Structure (14 sections, 7 theorems, 83 equations, 1 table)

This paper contains 14 sections, 7 theorems, 83 equations, 1 table.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

Let $k$ be a field, let $G$ be an absolutely simple $k$-group of classical type, and let $H$ be an isotropic maximal reductive subgroup of maximal rank in $G$. Up to conjugacy, the embedding of indices of $H \subset G$ is one of those listed in Tables A_n, B_n, C_n, D_4 and D_n for the cases where $

Theorems & Definitions (15)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Corollary 1.2
  • Corollary 1.3
  • Theorem 1.4
  • Definition 2.1
  • Definition 2.2
  • Lemma 2.3: Table 1, Lem. 2.1 of S
  • Definition 2.4: Def. 2.4 of S
  • Definition 2.5: Def. 1 of S
  • Theorem 3.1
  • ...and 5 more