Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Multicritical quantum sensors driven by symmetry-breaking

Sayan Mondal, Ayan Sahoo, Ujjwal Sen, Debraj Rakshit

TL;DR

The paper demonstrates that symmetry-breaking can serve as an independent resource for quantum-enhanced sensing near multicritical points, outside of gap-closing mechanisms. In the 1D Kitaev chain, single-parameter estimation of the pairing amplitude $ Delta$ achieves Heisenberg scaling with $ F_{ Delta Delta} \sim L^2$ along a gapless line at the multicritical point, while multiparameter sensing of $(\nmu,\nDelta)$ yields $\nG \sim L^6$, indicating super-Heisenberg scaling in a narrow parameter window where both symmetry-breaking and gap closing influence the QFIM. The work also analyzes practical constraints, showing that even with finite-state preparation times, advantageous regions exist where quantum sensitivity remains superior to classical limits. Overall, multicritical systems emerge as a promising platform for high-precision, multiparameter quantum metrology, highlighting symmetry-breaking as a distinct metrological resource.

Abstract

Quantum criticality has been demonstrated as a useful quantum resource for parameter estimation. This includes second-order, topological and localization transitions. In all these works reported so far, gap-to-gapless transition at criticality has been identified as a crucial resource for achieving the quantum-enhanced sensing, although there are several important concepts associated with criticality, such as long-range correlation, symmetry breaking. In this work, we show that symmetry-breaking alone can drive a quantum-enhanced sensing, even without any gap-to-gapless transition. We analytically demonstrate that the estimation of the superconducting pairing amplitude in the one-dimensional Kitaev model achieves Heisenberg scaling when the system is prepared near a multicritical point and is varied along a gapless critical line, implying symmetry breaking as a standalone metrological resource. Extending our analysis in the realm of simultaneous multiparameter estimation of both the pairing term and the chemical potential, we show that it is possible to obtain $L^6$ scaling in a narrow parameter range, but with definite observable consequence, where the quantum advantage is assisted by gap-to-gapless transition as well. Our work thus identifies a new resource for criticality-enhanced quantum sensing, and also suggests multicritical systems as useful platform for multiparameter sensing.

Multicritical quantum sensors driven by symmetry-breaking

TL;DR

The paper demonstrates that symmetry-breaking can serve as an independent resource for quantum-enhanced sensing near multicritical points, outside of gap-closing mechanisms. In the 1D Kitaev chain, single-parameter estimation of the pairing amplitude achieves Heisenberg scaling with along a gapless line at the multicritical point, while multiparameter sensing of yields , indicating super-Heisenberg scaling in a narrow parameter window where both symmetry-breaking and gap closing influence the QFIM. The work also analyzes practical constraints, showing that even with finite-state preparation times, advantageous regions exist where quantum sensitivity remains superior to classical limits. Overall, multicritical systems emerge as a promising platform for high-precision, multiparameter quantum metrology, highlighting symmetry-breaking as a distinct metrological resource.

Abstract

Quantum criticality has been demonstrated as a useful quantum resource for parameter estimation. This includes second-order, topological and localization transitions. In all these works reported so far, gap-to-gapless transition at criticality has been identified as a crucial resource for achieving the quantum-enhanced sensing, although there are several important concepts associated with criticality, such as long-range correlation, symmetry breaking. In this work, we show that symmetry-breaking alone can drive a quantum-enhanced sensing, even without any gap-to-gapless transition. We analytically demonstrate that the estimation of the superconducting pairing amplitude in the one-dimensional Kitaev model achieves Heisenberg scaling when the system is prepared near a multicritical point and is varied along a gapless critical line, implying symmetry breaking as a standalone metrological resource. Extending our analysis in the realm of simultaneous multiparameter estimation of both the pairing term and the chemical potential, we show that it is possible to obtain scaling in a narrow parameter range, but with definite observable consequence, where the quantum advantage is assisted by gap-to-gapless transition as well. Our work thus identifies a new resource for criticality-enhanced quantum sensing, and also suggests multicritical systems as useful platform for multiparameter sensing.
Paper Structure (12 sections, 35 equations, 12 figures)

This paper contains 12 sections, 35 equations, 12 figures.

Figures (12)

  • Figure 1: Schematic for quantum-enhanced sensing assisted by symmetry-breaking: The phase diagram shows different topological phases in the $\mu$-$\Delta$ plane. The red and the green lines are gapless. In the left panel, the protocol of sensing $\Delta$ is presented. $\mathcal{F}_{\Delta\Delta}$ has an quantum-enhanced scaling when the system is prepared at the critical line of $\mu=\mu_c$ (near the multicritical point, at A), and driven to, say B. We note that this is enhancement of scaling is not because of gap-to-gapless transition, but rather due to breaking of $U(1)$ symmetry. In the multi-parameter regime, one can envision a case where system is prepared at C, and both the parameters are maneuvered along the directed arrows. Since, we are in a two-dimensional plane, the point C can be approached from multiple directions. This leads to a quantum-enhanced scaling for the multi-parameter precision estimator. This involves, both, a gap-to-gapless transition and the symmetry-breaking.
  • Figure 2: Variation of $\mathcal{F}_{\Delta\Delta}$ near the multicritical point: (a) $\mathcal{F}_{\Delta\Delta}$ for system sizes $L$ = 400 (solid blue line), 600 (dot-dashed orange line), 800 (dotted green line), 1000 (dashed red line) are presented with respect to $\Delta$ keeping a fixed $\mu = 2$. This is a representative case, we observe similar nature for various other system-sizes as well. The finite-size scaling of $\mathcal{F}_{\Delta\Delta}$ is presented in (b). Setting $\mu = 2$, $\mathcal{F}_{\Delta\Delta}$ at $\Delta = 10^{-7}$ (circular markers) scale as $\mathcal{F}_{\Delta\Delta}^a \sim L^2$ while at $\Delta = 0.7$ (square markers) they scale as $\mathcal{F}_{\Delta\Delta}^b \sim L$. The straight lines are the best fit. (c) We present the scaling exponents $\beta$ of $\mathcal{F}_{\Delta\Delta}$ against the parameter $\Delta$. We identify three regions, (i) low $\Delta$ regime: $\Delta < 5\times10^{-4}$ is represented by light blue color where $\mathcal{F}_{\Delta\Delta} \sim L^2$; (ii) intermediate $\Delta$ regime : $5\times10^{-4}\leq\Delta\leq0.02$ represented by light green color where $\beta$ transitions; (iii) large $\Delta$ regime: $\Delta > 0.02$ is represented by light pink color where $\mathcal{F}_{\Delta\Delta} \sim L$.
  • Figure 3: The variation of $\mathcal{F}_{\mu\mu}$ around the multicriticality : (a) $\mathcal{F}_{\mu\mu}$ for system sizes $L$ = 400 (solid blue line), 600 (dot-dashed orange line), 800 (dotted green line), 1000 (dashed red line) are presented against $\mu$, where in the x-axis $\mu_c = 2$ has been subtracted from $\mu$. $\Delta = 0.001$ is set for all cases. This is a representative case, we observe a similar nature for various other system-sizes. (b) The finite-size scaling of $\mathcal{F}_{\mu\mu}$ is presented at $\mu = 2$ and two different $\Delta$. Considering $\Delta = 10^{-7}$, we observe $\mathcal{F}_{\mu\mu}^a \sim L^{6}$ (circular markers) and $\Delta = 0.7$, we observe $\mathcal{F}_{\mu\mu}^b \sim L^{2}$ (square markers). The straight lines are the best fit. (c) We present the scaling exponents $\beta$ of $\mathcal{F}_{\mu\mu}$ against the parameter $\Delta$. We identify three regions, (i) low $\Delta$ regime: $\Delta < 10^{-3}$ represented by light blue color where $\mathcal{F}_{\mu\mu} \sim L^6$; (ii) intermediate $\Delta$ regime: $10^{-3}\leq\Delta\leq10^{-2}$ is represented by light green color, where $\beta$ transitions from $6$ to $2$; (iii) large $\Delta$ regime: $\Delta > 10^{-2}$ is represented by light pink color, where $\mathcal{F}_{\mu\mu} \sim L^2$.
  • Figure 4: Variation of $\mathcal{G}$ near multicriticality: (a) The quantity $\mathcal{G}$ is presented with respect to the tuning parameters $\mu$ and $\Delta$ in the vicinity of the multicriticality. The system size is $L = 1000$. (b) The finite-size scaling of $\mathcal{G}$ is presented. Setting $\mu = 2$, $\mathcal{G}$ at $\Delta = 10^{-7}$ (circular markers) scale as $\mathcal{G}^a \sim L^6$, while at $\Delta = 0.7$ (square markers) we have $\mathcal{G}^b \sim L$. The straight lines are the best fit. (c) We present the scaling exponents $\beta$ of $\mathcal{G}$ against the parameter $\Delta$. We identify three regions, (i) low $\Delta$ regime: $\Delta < 10^{-5}$ is represented by light blue color where $\mathcal{G} \sim L^6$; (ii) intermediate $\Delta$ regime : $10^{-5}\leq\Delta\leq0.03$ represented by light green color where $\beta$ transitions for both $\mathcal{F}_{\Delta\Delta}$ and $\mathcal{G}$; (iii) large $\Delta$ regime: $\Delta > 0.03$ is represented by light pink color where $\mathcal{F}_{\Delta\Delta}, \mathcal{G} \sim L$.
  • Figure 5: Region of good sensor: The QFIM elements (a)$\mathcal{F}_{\mu \mu}^{-1}$, (b)$\mathcal{F}^{-1}_{\Delta \Delta}$ and (c)$\mathcal{G}^{-1}$ are presented. The value of $\mu$ is fixed at $\mu = 2$. According to quantum Cramér-Rao bound, $\delta {\theta}^2 \geq (M F_{\theta})^{-1}$, where $M$ is the number of measurements. Thus for a effective sensor, the values of $(M F_{\theta})^{-1}$ should be at-least lesser by an order than the parameter $\theta$ that is being sensed, viz. $1/\sqrt{MF_{\theta}} \ll |\theta|$. Typically, the experiments are repeated for few thousand times, i.e., $M=10^3-10^4$. Hence, practical parametric regime for effective sensing can be identified by validity of the constraint, ${F_{\theta}}^{-1/2} < |\theta|$. We shade the regions gray, where this is not the case. In (a) and (b), we consider single-parameter estimation case, while in (c) we consider the multi-parameter estimation.
  • ...and 7 more figures